Deadlines Calendar

« December 2018 »

S M T W T F S
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

View Large Calendar


Class Action by Status


'pending' Listing

Ticketmaster (Order Processing Fees) »

Defendant: Ticketmaster

Consumers who purchased tickets from ticketmaster.com from October 21, 1999 to February 27, 2013 and paid for an Order Processing Fee may be eligible for refunds.   Consumer who also purchased UPS delivery for the tickets during the class period may also be eligible for additional discounts on future UPS ticket… Learn More.

Ticketmaster (Order Processing Fees) »

Defendant: Ticketmaster
Source: http://www.ticketfeelitigation.com/

Consumers who purchased tickets from ticketmaster.com from October 21, 1999 to February 27, 2013 and paid for an Order Processing Fee may be eligible for refunds.   Consumer who also purchased UPS delivery for the tickets during the class period may also be eligible for additional discounts on future UPS ticket deliveries.  Ticketmaster reached a $403.3 million settlement over allegations of excessive and deceptive fees.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Fiat Chrysler (Emissions-Cheating Software) »

Defendant: Fiat Chrysler; Bosch

Alleges that Fiat Chrysler fraudulently concealed, falsely advertised, and violated consumer laws by installing software that only turns on emissions controls when the certain Dodge RAM EcoDiesel and Jeep Grand Cherokee EcoDiesel vehicles are being tested and shuts down emissions controls during normal operations, releasing more pollution than allowed by… Learn More.

Fiat Chrysler (Emissions-Cheating Software) »

Defendant: Fiat Chrysler; Bosch

Alleges that Fiat Chrysler fraudulently concealed, falsely advertised, and violated consumer laws by installing software that only turns on emissions controls when the certain Dodge RAM EcoDiesel and Jeep Grand Cherokee EcoDiesel vehicles are being tested and shuts down emissions controls during normal operations, releasing more pollution than allowed by law. The case is Chavez et al v. FCA US LLC; Robert Bosch GMBH, and Robert Bosch LLC, Case No. 3:16-cv-06909, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Breathometer, Inc. (Original and Breeze) »

Defendant: Breathometer, Inc.

Consumers who purchased breathometer Original or Breeze will be eligible to receive full refunds.  According to the Federal Trade Commission complaint, Breathometer falsely advertised that the breathalyzer devices could accurately calculate blood alcohol content and were “law-enforcement grade product.”  The FTC also charged Breathometer with falsely claiming its products went… Learn More.

Breathometer, Inc. (Original and Breeze) »

Defendant: Breathometer, Inc.

Consumers who purchased breathometer Original or Breeze will be eligible to receive full refunds.  According to the Federal Trade Commission complaint, Breathometer falsely advertised that the breathalyzer devices could accurately calculate blood alcohol content and were “law-enforcement grade product.”  The FTC also charged Breathometer with falsely claiming its products went through government-lab grade testing and knew that the results understated BAC levels.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Ford (Exhaust) »

Defendant: Ford

Alleges that 2011-2015 Ford Explorer vehicles are defectively designed, allowing exhaust odor to enter into the vehicle. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses (maximum of $500). The court approved the settlement on June 21, 2017 but the approval of the Settlement… Learn More.

Ford (Exhaust) »

Defendant: Ford

Alleges that 2011-2015 Ford Explorer vehicles are defectively designed, allowing exhaust odor to enter into the vehicle. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses (maximum of $500).

The court approved the settlement on June 21, 2017 but the approval of the Settlement has been appealed.

Requests for reimbursement under the Customer Satisfaction Program must be submitted to your dealer before March 31, 2018.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Volkswagen (3.0-liter diesel emissions) »

Defendant: Volkswagen

Volkswagen agree to buyback 3.0 liter diesel cars to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding Volkswagen’s false advertising of the emissions level of the 3.0 liter diesel Volkswagen and Audi vehicles.  Consumers who have purchased or leased those models may be eligible for a cash payment and (a) have… Learn More.

Volkswagen (3.0-liter diesel emissions) »

Defendant: Volkswagen
Source: https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/refunds/volkswagen-30l-settlement

Volkswagen agree to buyback 3.0 liter diesel cars to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding Volkswagen’s false advertising of the emissions level of the 3.0 liter diesel Volkswagen and Audi vehicles.  Consumers who have purchased or leased those models may be eligible for a cash payment and (a) have Volkswagen buy back their car or (b) accept the Approved Emissions Modification.

Deadline to register as former owner is May 1, 2017

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

BMW (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: BMW

Alleges that certain BMW vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain BMW vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.    Learn More.

BMW (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: BMW

Alleges that certain BMW vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain BMW vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Mazda (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: Mazda

Alleges that certain Mazda vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Mazda vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.    Learn More.

Mazda (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: Mazda

Alleges that certain Mazda vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Mazda vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Subaru (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: Subaru

Alleges that certain Subaru vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Subaru vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.    Learn More.

Subaru (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: Subaru

Alleges that certain Subaru vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Subaru vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Toyota (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: Toyota

Alleges that certain Toyota vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Toyota vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.    Learn More.

Toyota (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: Toyota

Alleges that certain Toyota vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Toyota vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Nissan (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Nissan

Alleges that certain Nissan vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Nissan vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between November 11, 2008 and September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who… Learn More.

Nissan (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Nissan

Alleges that certain Nissan vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Nissan vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between November 11, 2008 and September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who currently own or lease certain Nissan vehicles as of September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Order Approving Class Settlement was entered on Feb. 28, 2018.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Honda (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Honda

Alleges that certain Honda vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Honda vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between November 11, 2008 and September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who currently own or lease… Learn More.

Honda (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Honda

Alleges that certain Honda vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Honda vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between November 11, 2008 and September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who currently own or lease certain Nissan vehicles as of September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Order Approving Class Settlement was entered on Feb. 28, 2018.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

MidFlorida Credit Union (Overdraft Fees) »

Defendant: MidFlorida Credit Union

Current and former account holders may be eligible for a share of the $2.3 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fees between November 24, 2010 and January 15, 2018 when they had sufficient funds available in the ledger balance to cover the transaction.  Class members will automatically receive payment… Learn More.

MidFlorida Credit Union (Overdraft Fees) »

Defendant: MidFlorida Credit Union

Current and former account holders may be eligible for a share of the $2.3 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fees between November 24, 2010 and January 15, 2018 when they had sufficient funds available in the ledger balance to cover the transaction.  Class members will automatically receive payment or account credit.

Final Approval Hearing is Feb. 23, 2018.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

JPMorgan Chase Bank (Lien Release) »

Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank

Borrowers who own residential property in California with a mortgage serviced by Chase between July 28, 2011 and August 1, 2017 where Chase subsequently released the lien but continued to attempt to collect on the unpaid balance on the loan may eligible for payment.  Class members will automatically receive payment.… Learn More.

JPMorgan Chase Bank (Lien Release) »

Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank

Borrowers who own residential property in California with a mortgage serviced by Chase between July 28, 2011 and August 1, 2017 where Chase subsequently released the lien but continued to attempt to collect on the unpaid balance on the loan may eligible for payment.  Class members will automatically receive payment. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Final Approval Hearing is Jan. 19, 2018.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Interline Brands, Inc. (DuraPro Toilet Connector) »

Defendant: Interline Brands, Inc.

Consumers who own or lease a residence that installed DuraPro Toilet Connector may be eligible for $4 cash per Toilet Connector (with a maximum of $20). Class members who experience property damage due to failure of Coupling Nut on the DuraPro Toilet Connector may be eligible to receive cash award… Learn More.

Interline Brands, Inc. (DuraPro Toilet Connector) »

Defendant: Interline Brands, Inc.

Consumers who own or lease a residence that installed DuraPro Toilet Connector may be eligible for $4 cash per Toilet Connector (with a maximum of $20). Class members who experience property damage due to failure of Coupling Nut on the DuraPro Toilet Connector may be eligible to receive cash award up to 30% of the property damage expenses. The company reached a settlement of allegations that the DuraPro Toilet Connectors have defective plastic Coupling Nuts.

Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 19, 2018. 

Deadline to file replacement claim is 2 years after final approval order.

Deadline to file property damage claim is 4 years after final approval order.

http://www.duraprotoiletconnectorsettlement.com/

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Mazuma Federal Credit Union (Overdraft Fees) »

Defendant: Mazuma Federal Credit Union

Current and former account holders may be eligible for a share of the $1.3 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fees between April 1, 2011 and September 30, 2015 when they had sufficient funds available in the ledger balance to cover the transaction. Class members will automatically receive payment or account… Learn More.

Mazuma Federal Credit Union (Overdraft Fees) »

Defendant: Mazuma Federal Credit Union

Current and former account holders may be eligible for a share of the $1.3 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fees between April 1, 2011 and September 30, 2015 when they had sufficient funds available in the ledger balance to cover the transaction. Class members will automatically receive payment or account credit. 

Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 23, 2018

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×