Keep the Information Flowing
Small contributions go a long way. Your donation to Consumer Action, a 501 (c)(3) nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, can help us cover the cost of research, writing, and translation of our materials. To keep our services free for those who need them. Select an amount to give.
Released: October 12, 2011
Supreme Court considers whether ‘right to sue’ means only right to arbitration
Source: Robert Barnes, Washington Post (Free Registration)
The Supreme Court justices asked the question half a dozen ways: When Congress writes legislation that says, “You have a right to sue,” why doesn’t that mean that consumers have a right to file a lawsuit in court?
And the lawyer on the receiving end of the queries answered each time: Because your precedents say so.
The case was about whether customers who are unhappy about the allegedly hidden costs of the credit cards they received from CompuCredit can sue the company in court, or whether they must abide by the fine print in their contracts. It said that all disputes must be handled by arbitration.
Read Full Article: Supreme Court considers whether ‘right to sue’ means only right to arbitration
Quick Menu
Support Consumer Action
Join Our Email List
Press Menu
Consumer Help Desk
- Help Desk
- Submit Your Complaints
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Links to Consumer Resources
- Consumer Service Guide (CSG)
- Alerts
- Consumer Booknotes
