Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
I.C. System Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: I.C. System Inc.
Consumers who received automated or prerecorded calls on their cell phones from I.C. System between December 14, 2008 and November 9, 2017 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
I.C. System Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: I.C. System Inc.
Consumers who received automated or prerecorded calls on their cell phones from I.C. System between December 14, 2008 and November 9, 2017 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Mercedes Benz (Seat Heater CA and NH) »
Defendant: Mercedes Benz (Seat Heater)
California and New Hampshire consumers who purchased or leased certain models may be eligible for repairs or reimbursement for past repairs. Alleges that 2000-2007 M-Class, 2006-2007 R-Class and 2007 G-Glass Mercedes Benz vehicles with seat heaters may overheat, burning a hole through the seat cover. Read More »
Mercedes Benz (Seat Heater CA and NH) »
Defendant: Mercedes Benz (Seat Heater)
California and New Hampshire consumers who purchased or leased certain models may be eligible for repairs or reimbursement for past repairs. Alleges that 2000-2007 M-Class, 2006-2007 R-Class and 2007 G-Glass Mercedes Benz vehicles with seat heaters may overheat, burning a hole through the seat cover.
×Johnson & Johnson (Aveeno) »
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson
Consumers who bought certain Aveeno Active Naturals products from May 7, 2007 to June 13, 2017 may be eligible for $2.50 cash per product purchased. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “natural” or “Active Naturals” when not all the ingredients were natural. Read More »
Johnson & Johnson (Aveeno) »
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson
Consumers who bought certain Aveeno Active Naturals products from May 7, 2007 to June 13, 2017 may be eligible for $2.50 cash per product purchased. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “natural” or “Active Naturals” when not all the ingredients were natural.
×XPO Logistics (TCPA) »
Defendant: XPO Logistics
Consumers who received prerecorded survey calls on their cell phones from XPO Logistics regarding an IKEA delivery after May 1, 2011 may be eligible for a pro rate share of the settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
XPO Logistics (TCPA) »
Defendant: XPO Logistics
Consumers who received prerecorded survey calls on their cell phones from XPO Logistics regarding an IKEA delivery after May 1, 2011 may be eligible for a pro rate share of the settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Bank of America (Credit Report) »
Defendant: Bank of America
Credit card accountholders whose credit card accounts were charged off by Bank of America and sold to a collection agency on or after January 1, 2008 and were discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy before October 1, 2015 may be eligible for payment. Alleges that Bank of America failed to update… Read More »
Bank of America (Credit Report) »
Defendant: Bank of America
Credit card accountholders whose credit card accounts were charged off by Bank of America and sold to a collection agency on or after January 1, 2008 and were discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy before October 1, 2015 may be eligible for payment. Alleges that Bank of America failed to update the information to the credit reporting agencies regarding the credit card accounts.
×Progressive Management Systems (TCPA) »
Defendant: Progressive Management Systems
Individuals who were non-patients and non-guarantors and received pre-recorded calls on their cell phones from Progressive Management Systems between January 25, 2012 and October 16, 2017 may be eligible for a pro rata share of $1.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone… Read More »
Progressive Management Systems (TCPA) »
Defendant: Progressive Management Systems
Individuals who were non-patients and non-guarantors and received pre-recorded calls on their cell phones from Progressive Management Systems between January 25, 2012 and October 16, 2017 may be eligible for a pro rata share of $1.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Sears (Kenmore Barbecue Grills) »
Defendant: Sears
Alleges that certain Kenmore barbecue grills are defective because the galvanized steel in the firebox trays ends up with rust. Consumers who bought or were gifted certain Kenmore Grill models with galvanized steel firebox that were manufactured between October 1, 2001 and September 30, 2014 may be eligible for free… Read More »
Sears (Kenmore Barbecue Grills) »
Defendant: Sears
Alleges that certain Kenmore barbecue grills are defective because the galvanized steel in the firebox trays ends up with rust. Consumers who bought or were gifted certain Kenmore Grill models with galvanized steel firebox that were manufactured between October 1, 2001 and September 30, 2014 may be eligible for free repairs or $180 Sears gift card or $125 cash payment.
×TransUnion (Rental Screening) »
Defendant: TransUnion
Individuals who were subjects of Trans Union Rental Screening Solutions SmartMove reports that contained “Alert List” information from February 2012 to December 2013 may be eligible for $400 cash and/or additional cash payment. The company agreed to a settlement over allegations of failing to comply with the Fair Credit Reporting… Read More »
TransUnion (Rental Screening) »
Defendant: TransUnion
Individuals who were subjects of Trans Union Rental Screening Solutions SmartMove reports that contained “Alert List” information from February 2012 to December 2013 may be eligible for $400 cash and/or additional cash payment. The company agreed to a settlement over allegations of failing to comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
×Sony Mobile Communications, Inc. (Xperia) »
Defendant: Sony Mobile Communications, Inc.
Consumers who bought or were gifted certain Sony mobile devices on or before August 3, 2017 may be eligible for warranty extension and partial reimbursement of the device’s manufacturer’s suggest retail price. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresenting the phones as “waterproof” when the phones were not… Read More »
Sony Mobile Communications, Inc. (Xperia) »
Defendant: Sony Mobile Communications, Inc.
Consumers who bought or were gifted certain Sony mobile devices on or before August 3, 2017 may be eligible for warranty extension and partial reimbursement of the device’s manufacturer’s suggest retail price. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresenting the phones as “waterproof” when the phones were not designed for ordinary underwater use.
×Burger King (Buy-One-Get-One-Free Coupon) »
Defendant: Burger King
Consumers who purchased two or more modified CROISSAN’WICH® breakfast sandwiches and redeemed a BOGO coupon but was charged more than the cost of one single unmodified CROISSAN’WICH® breakfast sandwich between October 1, 2015 and May 19, 2017 may be eligible for $5 cash or $2 gift cards. Read More »
Burger King (Buy-One-Get-One-Free Coupon) »
Defendant: Burger King
Consumers who purchased two or more modified CROISSAN’WICH® breakfast sandwiches and redeemed a BOGO coupon but was charged more than the cost of one single unmodified CROISSAN’WICH® breakfast sandwich between October 1, 2015 and May 19, 2017 may be eligible for $5 cash or $2 gift cards.
×Neiman Marcus (Data Breach) »
Defendant: Neiman Marcus
Neiman Marcus agreed to a settlement as a result of a data breach of payment systems used at Neiman Marcus stores. Consumers who paid with a credit card or debit card at Neiman Marcus, Bergdoff Goodman, Last Call or Cusp stores between July 16, 2013 and January 10, 2014 may… Read More »
Neiman Marcus (Data Breach) »
Defendant: Neiman Marcus
Source: https://www.bna.com/neiman-marcus-pay-n57982085494/
Neiman Marcus agreed to a settlement as a result of a data breach of payment systems used at Neiman Marcus stores. Consumers who paid with a credit card or debit card at Neiman Marcus, Bergdoff Goodman, Last Call or Cusp stores between July 16, 2013 and January 10, 2014 may be eligible for up to $100 cash.
×Uber (FCRA) »
Defendant: Uber
Alleges that Uber failed to clearly disclose that the background checks would be obtained for individuals who sought to drive for Uber as an independent transportation provider in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who sought to use the Uber app to be a transportation provider and had… Read More »
Uber (FCRA) »
Defendant: Uber
Alleges that Uber failed to clearly disclose that the background checks would be obtained for individuals who sought to drive for Uber as an independent transportation provider in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who sought to use the Uber app to be a transportation provider and had a background check before January 3, 2015 may be eligible for an estimated payment of $27 or $62.
×Rooms To Go (Protection Plans) »
Defendant: Rooms To Go
Consumers who bought Rooms to Go’s certain ForceField Fabric or Leather Protection Plans during the class period (various dates depending on the state) may be eligible for either a check for up to 10% of the total amount paid or a merchandise voucher equal to 45% of the total amount… Read More »
Rooms To Go (Protection Plans) »
Defendant: Rooms To Go
Consumers who bought Rooms to Go’s certain ForceField Fabric or Leather Protection Plans during the class period (various dates depending on the state) may be eligible for either a check for up to 10% of the total amount paid or a merchandise voucher equal to 45% of the total amount paid. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to apply the furniture protectant under the plan.
×Mercedes Benz (Seat Heater) »
Defendant: Mercedes Benz
The lawsuit alleges that 2000-2007 M-Class, 2006-2007 R-Class and 2007 G-Glass Mercedes Benz vehicles with seat heaters may overheat, burning a hole through the seat cover. Consumers who purchased or leased these models may be eligible for repairs or reimbursement for past repairs. Deadline for consumers in California and New… Read More »
Mercedes Benz (Seat Heater) »
Defendant: Mercedes Benz
The lawsuit alleges that 2000-2007 M-Class, 2006-2007 R-Class and 2007 G-Glass Mercedes Benz vehicles with seat heaters may overheat, burning a hole through the seat cover. Consumers who purchased or leased these models may be eligible for repairs or reimbursement for past repairs. Deadline for consumers in California and New Hampshire is Feb. 6, 2018.
×Nissan (InTouch) »
Defendant: Nissan
The lawsuit alleges that the InTouch system in 2014 Infiniti Q50 vehicles do not perform as advertised. Consumers who purchased or leased these models may be eligible for cash payment or voucher. The cash payment is $30 cash plus additional $55 cash for those who downloaded the Infinit InTouch App… Read More »
Nissan (InTouch) »
Defendant: Nissan
The lawsuit alleges that the InTouch system in 2014 Infiniti Q50 vehicles do not perform as advertised. Consumers who purchased or leased these models may be eligible for cash payment or voucher. The cash payment is $30 cash plus additional $55 cash for those who downloaded the Infinit InTouch App before April 17, 2017. The voucher is worth $500 towards a lease or $750 towards a purchase of a new Infiniti vehicle.
×