Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
The Body Shop (FACTA) »
Defendant: The Body Shop
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions and received an electronically-printed receipt that displayed the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card between February 12, 2011 and March 21, 2017 at The Body Shop store may be eligible for a $12 The Body Shop gift card. Consumers… Read More »
The Body Shop (FACTA) »
Defendant: The Body Shop
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions and received an electronically-printed receipt that displayed the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card between February 12, 2011 and March 21, 2017 at The Body Shop store may be eligible for a $12 The Body Shop gift card. Consumers who were enrolled into The Body Shop’s “Love Your BodyTM Loyalty Program” and conducted credit or debit card transactions between April 23, 2014 and January 6, 2016 at The Body Shop store may be eligible for a $12 The Body Shop gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.
×Sears (Gift Card) »
Defendant: Sears
California consumers with a Sears gift card with a balance less than $10 between January 12, 2013 and June 21, 2017 and were unable to redeem the gift card for cash may be eligible for $9.99 gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violating California Civil Code… Read More »
Sears (Gift Card) »
Defendant: Sears
California consumers with a Sears gift card with a balance less than $10 between January 12, 2013 and June 21, 2017 and were unable to redeem the gift card for cash may be eligible for $9.99 gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violating California Civil Code section 1749.5 that requires that gift card be redeemed for cash when the gift card balance is below $10.
Final Approval Hearing is Oct. 4, 2017.
×Dodge Ram (Steering) »
Defendant: Chrysler Group LLC
The lawsuit alleges that in certain 2009-2012 Dodge Ram truck models 2500 4x4, 3500 4x4, 3500 Cab Chassis, 4500, and 5500 have defective steering linkage system. California consumers who purchased these models between July 1, 2009 and November 6, 2013 and did not qualify in the Repurchase Program may be… Read More »
Dodge Ram (Steering) »
Defendant: Chrysler Group LLC
The lawsuit alleges that in certain 2009-2012 Dodge Ram truck models 2500 4x4, 3500 4x4, 3500 Cab Chassis, 4500, and 5500 have defective steering linkage system. California consumers who purchased these models between July 1, 2009 and November 6, 2013 and did not qualify in the Repurchase Program may be eligible for warranty extension and cash payment.
Final Approval Hearing is Aug. 14, 2017.
×Patriot Payment (TCPA) »
Defendant: Patriot Payment Group, LLC; North American Bancard, LLC
Consumers who received automated or prerecorded call on their cell phones from Patriot Payment between February 27, 2011 and April 4, 2017 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $3.7 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. … Read More »
Patriot Payment (TCPA) »
Defendant: Patriot Payment Group, LLC; North American Bancard, LLC
Consumers who received automated or prerecorded call on their cell phones from Patriot Payment between February 27, 2011 and April 4, 2017 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $3.7 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×BMW (5 Series E60 and E61) »
Defendant: BMW
Alleges that 2004-2010 BMW 5 Series (E60 and E61) vehicles are defective, with water damage to electronic components in the spare tire well. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for free repairs or reimbursement for previous repair expenses. Read More »
BMW (5 Series E60 and E61) »
Defendant: BMW
Alleges that 2004-2010 BMW 5 Series (E60 and E61) vehicles are defective, with water damage to electronic components in the spare tire well. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for free repairs or reimbursement for previous repair expenses.
×Hyland’s Inc. (Children’s Homeopathic Products) »
Defendant: Hyland’s Inc.
Consumers who bought certain Hyland’s products between March 8, 2008 and March 30, 2017 may be eligible for full cash refund based on their purchase receipts or a refund for up to two products. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the effectiveness the products. Read More »
Hyland’s Inc. (Children’s Homeopathic Products) »
Defendant: Hyland’s Inc.
Consumers who bought certain Hyland’s products between March 8, 2008 and March 30, 2017 may be eligible for full cash refund based on their purchase receipts or a refund for up to two products. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the effectiveness the products.
×Toyota (Takata Airbag) »
Defendant: Toyota
Alleges that certain Toyota vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Toyota vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017. Read More »
Toyota (Takata Airbag) »
Defendant: Toyota
Alleges that certain Toyota vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Toyota vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.
Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.
×Subaru (Takata Airbag) »
Defendant: Subaru
Alleges that certain Subaru vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Subaru vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017. Read More »
Subaru (Takata Airbag) »
Defendant: Subaru
Alleges that certain Subaru vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Subaru vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.
Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.
×Mazda (Takata Airbag) »
Defendant: Mazda
Alleges that certain Mazda vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Mazda vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017. Read More »
Mazda (Takata Airbag) »
Defendant: Mazda
Alleges that certain Mazda vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Mazda vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.
Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.
×BMW (Takata Airbag) »
Defendant: BMW
Alleges that certain BMW vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain BMW vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017. Read More »
BMW (Takata Airbag) »
Defendant: BMW
Alleges that certain BMW vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain BMW vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.
Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.
×Toyota (Rust Frames) »
Defendant: Toyota
The lawsuit alleges that certain Toyota truck models have frames that were subject to rust, causing corrosion that could threaten the structural integrity of the trucks. Consumers who purchased or leased certain 2005-2010 Tacoma models, 2005-2008 Sequoia models, and 2007-2008 Tundra models may be eligible for a share of the… Read More »
Toyota (Rust Frames) »
Defendant: Toyota
Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-toyota-settlement-idUSKBN1370PE
The lawsuit alleges that certain Toyota truck models have frames that were subject to rust, causing corrosion that could threaten the structural integrity of the trucks. Consumers who purchased or leased certain 2005-2010 Tacoma models, 2005-2008 Sequoia models, and 2007-2008 Tundra models may be eligible for a share of the $3.4 billion settlement. The case is Brian Warner, et al. v. Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc., Case No. 2:15-cv-02171, in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
×Joe’s Jeans (“Made in USA”) »
Defendant: Joe’s Jeans, Inc. ; Hudson Clothing, LLC
Consumers who bought Joe’s Jeans or Hudson Clothing products with the “Made in USA” label between January 7, 2011 and December 31, 2015 may be eligible for one tote bag or one t-shirt. The company reached a settlement over allegations of improperly labeling and advertising the product as “Made in… Read More »
Joe’s Jeans (“Made in USA”) »
Defendant: Joe’s Jeans, Inc. ; Hudson Clothing, LLC
Consumers who bought Joe’s Jeans or Hudson Clothing products with the “Made in USA” label between January 7, 2011 and December 31, 2015 may be eligible for one tote bag or one t-shirt. The company reached a settlement over allegations of improperly labeling and advertising the product as “Made in USA” when it contained some foreign made parts.
×i-Health, Inc. (Brainstrong) »
Defendant: i-Health, Inc.
Consumers who bought certain Brainstrong products between January 1, 2011 and March 4, 2016 may be eligible for a full refund with a valid receipt submission. Class members without valid receipt submission may be eligible for $4 cash or $6.50 voucher. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresenting… Read More »
i-Health, Inc. (Brainstrong) »
Defendant: i-Health, Inc.
Consumers who bought certain Brainstrong products between January 1, 2011 and March 4, 2016 may be eligible for a full refund with a valid receipt submission. Class members without valid receipt submission may be eligible for $4 cash or $6.50 voucher. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresenting the efficacy of the products.
×FirstMerit Bank (Overdraft Fees) »
Defendant: FirstMerit Bank
Current and former account holders may be eligible for cash payment or debt forgiveness from $15.9 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fees between March 16, 2005 and August 13, 2010 due to FirstMerit Bank’s practice of reordering transactions. Read More »
FirstMerit Bank (Overdraft Fees) »
Defendant: FirstMerit Bank
Current and former account holders may be eligible for cash payment or debt forgiveness from $15.9 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fees between March 16, 2005 and August 13, 2010 due to FirstMerit Bank’s practice of reordering transactions.
×BMW (Convertible) »
Defendant: BMW
Alleges that 2004-2010 BMW 6 Series (E64) Convertibles are defective, with the convertible top not completely open or close, becoming stuck. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for free software update, cash reimbursement for previous repair expenses, and warranty extension. Read More »
BMW (Convertible) »
Defendant: BMW
Alleges that 2004-2010 BMW 6 Series (E64) Convertibles are defective, with the convertible top not completely open or close, becoming stuck. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for free software update, cash reimbursement for previous repair expenses, and warranty extension.
×