Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Global Tel*Link Corporation (TCPA) »
Defendant: Global Tel*Link Corporation
Individuals who received automated calls from Global Tel*Link to their cell phones between December 5, 2010 and April 7, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $8.8 million settlement. Thecompany reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Global Tel*Link Corporation (TCPA) »
Defendant: Global Tel*Link Corporation
Individuals who received automated calls from Global Tel*Link to their cell phones between December 5, 2010 and April 7, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $8.8 million settlement. Thecompany reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Viridian Energy (Variable Rate) »
Defendant: Viridian Energy
Alleges that Viridian Energy charged excessive variable rates for gas and electricity. Current and former Viridian Energy consumers enrolled in the variable rate plan between July 1, 2009 and December 31, 2016 may be eligible for cash payment or account credit. Read More »
Viridian Energy (Variable Rate) »
Defendant: Viridian Energy
Alleges that Viridian Energy charged excessive variable rates for gas and electricity. Current and former Viridian Energy consumers enrolled in the variable rate plan between July 1, 2009 and December 31, 2016 may be eligible for cash payment or account credit.
×ExactTarget LLC (Simply Fashion Text Messages) »
Defendant: ExactTarget LLC
Consumers who received unsolicited text messages from Simply Fashion between July 23, 2009 and September 30, 2013 may be eligible for a share of the $6.2 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
ExactTarget LLC (Simply Fashion Text Messages) »
Defendant: ExactTarget LLC
Consumers who received unsolicited text messages from Simply Fashion between July 23, 2009 and September 30, 2013 may be eligible for a share of the $6.2 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Venture Data, LLC and Public Opinions Strategies, LLC (TCPA) »
Defendant: Venture Data, LLC and Public Opinions Strategies, LLC.
Individuals who received automated calls from Venture Data to their cell phones on June 11, 2014, or August 19, 2014 or September 9, 2014 regarding a Public Opinion Strategies survey may be eligible for a share of the $2.1 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of… Read More »
Venture Data, LLC and Public Opinions Strategies, LLC (TCPA) »
Defendant: Venture Data, LLC and Public Opinions Strategies, LLC.
Individuals who received automated calls from Venture Data to their cell phones on June 11, 2014, or August 19, 2014 or September 9, 2014 regarding a Public Opinion Strategies survey may be eligible for a share of the $2.1 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Guess (Advertising) »
Defendant: Guess
California residents who bought products from Guess Factory that were advertised with a higher reference price between April 17, 2011 and February 26, 2018 may be eligible for a merchandise voucher. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misleadingly labeling the price of the merchandise. Read More »
Guess (Advertising) »
Defendant: Guess
California residents who bought products from Guess Factory that were advertised with a higher reference price between April 17, 2011 and February 26, 2018 may be eligible for a merchandise voucher. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misleadingly labeling the price of the merchandise.
×Deoleo USA, Inc. (Bertolli Olive Oil) »
Defendant: Deoleo USA, Inc.
Consumers who bought certain Bertolli Olive Oil products with the “Imported from Italy” or “Extra Virgin” label between May 23, 2010 and April 16, 2016 may be eligible for cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations that the olives did not originate in Italy as implied by the label “Imported… Read More »
Deoleo USA, Inc. (Bertolli Olive Oil) »
Defendant: Deoleo USA, Inc.
Consumers who bought certain Bertolli Olive Oil products with the “Imported from Italy” or “Extra Virgin” label between May 23, 2010 and April 16, 2016 may be eligible for cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations that the olives did not originate in Italy as implied by the label “Imported from Italy” on oil products and the distribution process did not adequately meet the standards as implied by label “extra virgin.”
Final Hearing is July 12, 2018. Claim deadline is 30 days after final approval by the court.
×Western Union (Fraud) »
Defendant: Western Union
Western Union will provide $586 million in consumer refunds to settle a Federal Trade Commission and US Department of Justice complaint for failing to stop fraud-related wire transfers, including those committed by its own agents. Consumers who were victims of fraud and made wire transfers through Western Union between January 1,… Read More »
Western Union (Fraud) »
Defendant: Western Union
Source: https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/refunds/western-union-settlement-faqs
Western Union will provide $586 million in consumer refunds to settle a Federal Trade Commission and US Department of Justice complaint for failing to stop fraud-related wire transfers, including those committed by its own agents. Consumers who were victims of fraud and made wire transfers through Western Union between January 1, 2004 and January 19, 2017 may be eligible for a remission payment.
×Amazon (Unauthorized In-app Charges) »
Defendant: Amazon
Amazon will provide $70 million in consumer refunds for unauthorized in-app charges made by a child between November 2011 and May 2016. Read More »
Amazon (Unauthorized In-app Charges) »
Defendant: Amazon
Source: https://www.amazon.com/gp/mas/refund-orders/in-apprefund/
Amazon will provide $70 million in consumer refunds for unauthorized in-app charges made by a child between November 2011 and May 2016.
×I.C. Systems (TCPA) »
Defendant: I.C. Systems
Individuals who received automated calls from I.C. Systems to their cell phones between December 14, 2008 and November 9, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $3.3 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
I.C. Systems (TCPA) »
Defendant: I.C. Systems
Individuals who received automated calls from I.C. Systems to their cell phones between December 14, 2008 and November 9, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $3.3 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Sports Warehouse (Advertising) »
Defendant: Sports Warehouse
California residents who bought products from Sports Merchandise that were advertised with a price comparison between January 17, 2013 and October 23, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $3 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misleadingly labeling the price of the merchandise. Read More »
Sports Warehouse (Advertising) »
Defendant: Sports Warehouse
California residents who bought products from Sports Merchandise that were advertised with a price comparison between January 17, 2013 and October 23, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $3 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misleadingly labeling the price of the merchandise.
×ANN Inc (Outlets) »
Defendant: ANN Inc
Consumers who bought an item at a discount with a price tag showing an “original” or “regular” price at a Ann Taylor Factory or Loft Outlet Store between May 5, 2012 and May 4, 2016 may be eligible for $5 cash or $12 voucher. The company reached a settlement over… Read More »
ANN Inc (Outlets) »
Defendant: ANN Inc
Consumers who bought an item at a discount with a price tag showing an “original” or “regular” price at a Ann Taylor Factory or Loft Outlet Store between May 5, 2012 and May 4, 2016 may be eligible for $5 cash or $12 voucher. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misleadingly labeling the price of the merchandise.
×Saar’s (FACTA) »
Defendant: Saar’s
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions and received an electronically-printed receipt that displayed the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card between July 20, 2014 and July 18, 2016 Saar’s or Super Saver Foods store may be eligible for up to $75 Saars gift card. The… Read More »
Saar’s (FACTA) »
Defendant: Saar’s
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions and received an electronically-printed receipt that displayed the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card between July 20, 2014 and July 18, 2016 Saar’s or Super Saver Foods store may be eligible for up to $75 Saars gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.
×Proctor & Gamble (Align probiotic supplements) »
Defendant: Proctor & Gamble
Consumers who bought Align between March 1, 2009 and June 6, 2016 may be eligible for a cash refund, with a maximum of $49.26. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the health benefits of the supplements. Read More »
Proctor & Gamble (Align probiotic supplements) »
Defendant: Proctor & Gamble
Consumers who bought Align between March 1, 2009 and June 6, 2016 may be eligible for a cash refund, with a maximum of $49.26. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the health benefits of the supplements.
×KT Health Holdings (KT Tape) »
Defendant: KT Health Holdings
Consumers who bought certain KT Tape products between October 30, 2011 and November 3, 2017 may be eligible for a partial refund of the full retail price. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising that the product would relieve pain from sports-related injuries and prevent sports-related injuries.… Read More »
KT Health Holdings (KT Tape) »
Defendant: KT Health Holdings
Consumers who bought certain KT Tape products between October 30, 2011 and November 3, 2017 may be eligible for a partial refund of the full retail price. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising that the product would relieve pain from sports-related injuries and prevent sports-related injuries.
×Costco (FCRA) »
Defendant: Costco
The lawsuit alleges that Costco failed to use the correct disclosure form as required by Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who applied for employment with Costco between August 10, 2014 and April 17, 2017 and had a background check report conducted with the Costco disclosure form may be eligible for cash… Read More »
Costco (FCRA) »
Defendant: Costco
The lawsuit alleges that Costco failed to use the correct disclosure form as required by Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who applied for employment with Costco between August 10, 2014 and April 17, 2017 and had a background check report conducted with the Costco disclosure form may be eligible for cash payment. Individuals who were denied employment after review of their background report may be eligible for cash payment.
×