Deadlines Calendar

« September 2020 »

S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

View Large Calendar


Class Action by Status


'pending' Listing

Southwest (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: Southwest

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and December 20, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $15 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing. Final Fairness Hearing is… Learn More.

Southwest (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: Southwest

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and December 20, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $15 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing.

Final Fairness Hearing is Mar. 22, 2019.

Learn More.

×

American Airlines (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: American Airlines

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and June 14, 2018 may be eligible for $45 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing. Final Fairness Hearing is Mar. 22, 2019.    Learn More.

American Airlines (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: American Airlines

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and June 14, 2018 may be eligible for $45 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing.

Final Fairness Hearing is Mar. 22, 2019.

Learn More.

×

MoneyGram (Fraud) »

Defendant: MoneyGram

MoneyGram agreed to $125 million settlementfor failing to stop fraud-related money transfers, including those committed by its own agents.  The company reached a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of violating previous FTC’s 2009 order and breaching 2012 Department of Justice deferred prosecution agreement.    Learn More.

MoneyGram (Fraud) »

Defendant: MoneyGram
Source: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2018/11/moneygram-agrees-pay-125-million-settle-allegations-company

MoneyGram agreed to $125 million settlementfor failing to stop fraud-related money transfers, including those committed by its own agents.  The company reached a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of violating previous FTC’s 2009 order and breaching 2012 Department of Justice deferred prosecution agreement.

Learn More.

×

AT&T (Unlimited Data) »

Defendant: AT&T

Current and former AT&T consumers who signed up for unlimited data plan prior to 2011 may be eligible for a partial refund.  The company reached a $60 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of failing to disclose to consumers that AT&T would reduce their data speeds when consumers… Learn More.

AT&T (Unlimited Data) »

Defendant: AT&T

Current and former AT&T consumers who signed up for unlimited data plan prior to 2011 may be eligible for a partial refund.  The company reached a $60 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of failing to disclose to consumers that AT&T would reduce their data speeds when consumers reach a certain amount of data use in their unlimited data plan.

Learn More.

×

Bank of America (Recurring Overdraft) »

Defendant: Bank of America

Current and former Bank of America account holders who were charged overdraft fees on debit card transactions made with certain merchants that were classified as recurring between January 1, 2012 and April 6, 2017 may be eligible for payment. Class members will automatically receive payment. Final Hearing is Jan. 29, 2020    Learn More.

Bank of America (Recurring Overdraft) »

Defendant: Bank of America

Current and former Bank of America account holders who were charged overdraft fees on debit card transactions made with certain merchants that were classified as recurring between January 1, 2012 and April 6, 2017 may be eligible for payment. Class members will automatically receive payment.

Final Hearing is Jan. 29, 2020

Learn More.

×

RBC Bank (Overdraft Fees) »

Defendant: RBC Bank

Current and former account holders may be eligible for cash payment or account credit from $7.5 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fees between October 10, 2007 and March 1, 2012 due to the Bank’s practice of reordering transactions. Class members will automatically receive payment. Final Approval Hearing is Apr. 22,… Learn More.

RBC Bank (Overdraft Fees) »

Defendant: RBC Bank

Current and former account holders may be eligible for cash payment or account credit from $7.5 million settlement if they were charged overdraft fees between October 10, 2007 and March 1, 2012 due to the Bank’s practice of reordering transactions. Class members will automatically receive payment.

Final Approval Hearing is Apr. 22, 2020

Learn More.

×

Wells Fargo (Consumer Report) »

Defendant: Wells Fargo

Consumers who were subject to consumer report prepared by First Advantage background check platform between June 1, 2015 and January 24, 2016 may be eligible for cash payment. The case is Rivera v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, Case No. CGC-17-562174, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. Final Approval… Learn More.

Wells Fargo (Consumer Report) »

Defendant: Wells Fargo

Consumers who were subject to consumer report prepared by First Advantage background check platform between June 1, 2015 and January 24, 2016 may be eligible for cash payment. The case is Rivera v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, Case No. CGC-17-562174, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco.

Final Approval Hearing is May 1, 2020.

Learn More.

×

Target (Debit Card) »

Defendant: Target

Alleges Target deceptively marketed its debit card and returned payment fees (“RPFs”). Target Debit Card holders who incurred RPFs between June 29, 2012 and December 2, 2019 may be eligible for payment.  Class members will automatically receive cash payment or debt reduction payment. Final Approval Hearing is Jun. 22, 2020.… Learn More.

Target (Debit Card) »

Defendant: Target

Alleges Target deceptively marketed its debit card and returned payment fees (“RPFs”). Target Debit Card holders who incurred RPFs between June 29, 2012 and December 2, 2019 may be eligible for payment.  Class members will automatically receive cash payment or debt reduction payment.

Final Approval Hearing is Jun. 22, 2020.

Learn More.

×

Early Warning Services, LLC (FCRA B3) »

Defendant: Early Warning Services, LLC

Alleges Early Warning Services failed to properly respond to consumer file disclosure requests in violation of the Fair Credit Report Act. Individuals who requested a copy of their file disclosure between March 7, 2015 and February 21, 2020 and whose file may have contained a Fraud Record but the file… Learn More.

Early Warning Services, LLC (FCRA B3) »

Defendant: Early Warning Services, LLC

Alleges Early Warning Services failed to properly respond to consumer file disclosure requests in violation of the Fair Credit Report Act. Individuals who requested a copy of their file disclosure between March 7, 2015 and February 21, 2020 and whose file may have contained a Fraud Record but the file disclosure didn’t use the word Fraud may be eligible for cash payment. Class members will automatically receive payment.

Final Hearing is June 22, 2020.

Learn More.

×

ZestFinance, Inc. (Spotloan) »

Defendant: ZestFinance, Inc.

Spotloan agreed to a settlement regarding its lending practices. The lawsuit alleges Spotloan violated federal and state laws by making loans with annual interest in excess of state law or lending without a license. Consumers who obtained a loan from Spotloan between January 1, 2012 and October 21, 2018 may… Learn More.

ZestFinance, Inc. (Spotloan) »

Defendant: ZestFinance, Inc.

Spotloan agreed to a settlement regarding its lending practices. The lawsuit alleges Spotloan violated federal and state laws by making loans with annual interest in excess of state law or lending without a license. Consumers who obtained a loan from Spotloan between January 1, 2012 and October 21, 2018 may be eligible for loan forgiveness or cash payment. Class members will automatically receive cash payment or loan forgiveness.

Final Fairness Hearing is Jun. 30, 2020.

Learn More.

×

Countrywide (Appraisal) »

Defendant: Countrywide

Alleges that Countrywide ordered property appraisals from LSA that were not done in compliance with Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Consumers who applied for Countrywide mortgage loans and received an appraisal by LSA between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2008 may be eligible for benefit check.  Class members will… Learn More.

Countrywide (Appraisal) »

Defendant: Countrywide

Alleges that Countrywide ordered property appraisals from LSA that were not done in compliance with Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Consumers who applied for Countrywide mortgage loans and received an appraisal by LSA between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2008 may be eligible for benefit check.  Class members will automatically receive payment when the settlement becomes final.

Final Fairness Hearing is Jul. 13, 2020.

Learn More.

×

Fashion Nova (Mail Order Rule) »

Defendant: Fashion Nova

Fashion Nova agreed to $9.3 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of failing to ship merchandise in a timely manner and failing to issue prompt refunds to consumers.    Learn More.

Fashion Nova (Mail Order Rule) »

Defendant: Fashion Nova

Fashion Nova agreed to $9.3 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of failing to ship merchandise in a timely manner and failing to issue prompt refunds to consumers.

Learn More.

×

Progressive Leasing (Rent-to-own) »

Defendant: Progressive Leasing

Progressive Leasing agreed to a $175 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of misleading consumers on the real price of the rent-to-own payment plans.     Learn More.

Progressive Leasing (Rent-to-own) »

Defendant: Progressive Leasing

Progressive Leasing agreed to a $175 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of misleading consumers on the real price of the rent-to-own payment plans. 

Learn More.

×

Apple (FaceTime) »

Defendant: Apple

Apple agreed to a $18 million settlement over allegations of intentionally breaking FaceTime on iOs 6. The case is Grace, et al. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 5:17-cv-00551, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The settlement is waiting for preliminary and final approval by the court.… Learn More.

Apple (FaceTime) »

Defendant: Apple
Source: https://www.engadget.com/apple-settle-broken-face-time-suit-074012321.html

Apple agreed to a $18 million settlement over allegations of intentionally breaking FaceTime on iOs 6. The case is Grace, et al. v. Apple Inc., Case No. 5:17-cv-00551, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

The settlement is waiting for preliminary and final approval by the court.

Learn More.

×

HSN (TCPA) »

Defendant: HSN

Consumers who received an automated telemarketing call from HSN between April 1, 2015 and December 12, 2019 may be eligible for cash payment. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Class members will automatically receive payment. Final Hearing is Aug. 14, 2020.… Learn More.

HSN (TCPA) »

Defendant: HSN

Consumers who received an automated telemarketing call from HSN between April 1, 2015 and December 12, 2019 may be eligible for cash payment. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Class members will automatically receive payment.

Final Hearing is Aug. 14, 2020.

Learn More.

×