Deadlines Calendar

« June 2019 »

S M T W T F S
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Class Action by Status


'pending' Listing

Ticketmaster (Order Processing Fees) »

Defendant: Ticketmaster

Consumers who purchased tickets from ticketmaster.com from October 21, 1999 to February 27, 2013 and paid for an Order Processing Fee may be eligible for refunds.   Consumer who also purchased UPS delivery for the tickets during the class period may also be eligible for additional discounts on future UPS ticket… Learn More.

Ticketmaster (Order Processing Fees) »

Defendant: Ticketmaster
Source: http://settlement.livenation.com/

Consumers who purchased tickets from ticketmaster.com from October 21, 1999 to February 27, 2013 and paid for an Order Processing Fee may be eligible for refunds.   Consumer who also purchased UPS delivery for the tickets during the class period may also be eligible for additional discounts on future UPS ticket deliveries.  Ticketmaster reached a $403.3 million settlement over allegations of excessive and deceptive fees.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Volkswagen (3.0-liter diesel emissions) »

Defendant: Volkswagen

Volkswagen agree to buyback 3.0 liter diesel cars to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding Volkswagen’s false advertising of the emissions level of the 3.0 liter diesel Volkswagen and Audi vehicles.  Consumers who have purchased or leased those models may be eligible for a cash payment and (a) have… Learn More.

Volkswagen (3.0-liter diesel emissions) »

Defendant: Volkswagen
Source: https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/refunds/volkswagen-30l-settlement

Volkswagen agree to buyback 3.0 liter diesel cars to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding Volkswagen’s false advertising of the emissions level of the 3.0 liter diesel Volkswagen and Audi vehicles.  Consumers who have purchased or leased those models may be eligible for a cash payment and (a) have Volkswagen buy back their car or (b) accept the Approved Emissions Modification.

Deadline to register as former owner is May 1, 2017

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

BMW (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: BMW

Alleges that certain BMW vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain BMW vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.    Learn More.

BMW (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: BMW

Alleges that certain BMW vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain BMW vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Mazda (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: Mazda

Alleges that certain Mazda vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Mazda vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.    Learn More.

Mazda (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: Mazda

Alleges that certain Mazda vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Mazda vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Subaru (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: Subaru

Alleges that certain Subaru vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Subaru vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.    Learn More.

Subaru (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: Subaru

Alleges that certain Subaru vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Subaru vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Toyota (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: Toyota

Alleges that certain Toyota vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Toyota vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.    Learn More.

Toyota (Takata Airbag) »

Defendant: Toyota

Alleges that certain Toyota vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Toyota vehicles between April 11, 2013 and June 9, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 25, 2017.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Nissan (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Nissan

Alleges that certain Nissan vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Nissan vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between November 11, 2008 and September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who… Learn More.

Nissan (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Nissan

Alleges that certain Nissan vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Nissan vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between November 11, 2008 and September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who currently own or lease certain Nissan vehicles as of September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Order Approving Class Settlement was entered on Feb. 28, 2018.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Honda (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Honda

Alleges that certain Honda vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Honda vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between November 11, 2008 and September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who currently own or lease… Learn More.

Honda (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Honda

Alleges that certain Honda vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Honda vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between November 11, 2008 and September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who currently own or lease certain Nissan vehicles as of September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Order Approving Class Settlement was entered on Feb. 28, 2018.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Interline Brands, Inc. (DuraPro Toilet Connector) »

Defendant: Interline Brands, Inc.

Consumers who own or lease a residence that installed DuraPro Toilet Connector may be eligible for $4 cash per Toilet Connector (with a maximum of $20). Class members who experience property damage due to failure of Coupling Nut on the DuraPro Toilet Connector may be eligible to receive cash award… Learn More.

Interline Brands, Inc. (DuraPro Toilet Connector) »

Defendant: Interline Brands, Inc.

Consumers who own or lease a residence that installed DuraPro Toilet Connector may be eligible for $4 cash per Toilet Connector (with a maximum of $20). Class members who experience property damage due to failure of Coupling Nut on the DuraPro Toilet Connector may be eligible to receive cash award up to 30% of the property damage expenses. The company reached a settlement of allegations that the DuraPro Toilet Connectors have defective plastic Coupling Nuts.

Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 19, 2018. 

Deadline to file replacement claim is 2 years after final approval order.

Deadline to file property damage claim is 4 years after final approval order.

http://www.duraprotoiletconnectorsettlement.com/

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Honda (CR-V) »

Defendant: Honda

Alleges that certain 2015 Honda CR-V vehicles are prone to unpleasant vibrations. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for repairs. Final Hearing is Nov. 6, 2018.    Learn More.

Honda (CR-V) »

Defendant: Honda

Alleges that certain 2015 Honda CR-V vehicles are prone to unpleasant vibrations. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for repairs.

Final Hearing is Nov. 6, 2018.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Ford (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Ford

Alleges that certain Ford vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Ford vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between June 19, 2014 and September 5, 2018 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who currently own or lease… Learn More.

Ford (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Ford

Alleges that certain Ford vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Ford vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between June 19, 2014 and September 5, 2018 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who currently own or lease certain Ford vehicles as of September 8, 2018 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Fairness Hearing is Dec. 11, 2018.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Campus Debt Solutions (TCPA) »

Defendant: Campus Debt Solutions

Consumers who received automated or prerecorded calls to their cell phones from advertising Campus Debt Solutions student loan consolidation and loan forgiveness services on or after October 16, 2013 may be eligible for a share of the $1.1 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of… Learn More.

Campus Debt Solutions (TCPA) »

Defendant: Campus Debt Solutions

Consumers who received automated or prerecorded calls to their cell phones from advertising Campus Debt Solutions student loan consolidation and loan forgiveness services on or after October 16, 2013 may be eligible for a share of the $1.1 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.  

Final Approval Hearing is Nov. 15, 2018

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Southwest (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: Southwest

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and December 20, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $15 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing. Final Fairness Hearing is… Learn More.

Southwest (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: Southwest

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and December 20, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $15 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing.

Final Fairness Hearing is Mar. 22, 2019.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

American Airlines (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: American Airlines

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and June 14, 2018 may be eligible for $45 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing. Final Fairness Hearing is Mar. 22, 2019.    Learn More.

American Airlines (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: American Airlines

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and June 14, 2018 may be eligible for $45 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing.

Final Fairness Hearing is Mar. 22, 2019.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

MoneyGram (Fraud) »

Defendant: MoneyGram

MoneyGram agreed to $125 million settlementfor failing to stop fraud-related money transfers, including those committed by its own agents.  The company reached a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of violating previous FTC’s 2009 order and breaching 2012 Department of Justice deferred prosecution agreement.    Learn More.

MoneyGram (Fraud) »

Defendant: MoneyGram
Source: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2018/11/moneygram-agrees-pay-125-million-settle-allegations-company

MoneyGram agreed to $125 million settlementfor failing to stop fraud-related money transfers, including those committed by its own agents.  The company reached a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of violating previous FTC’s 2009 order and breaching 2012 Department of Justice deferred prosecution agreement.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×