Deadlines Calendar

« August 2019 »

S M T W T F S
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Class Action by Status


'pending' Listing

Ticketmaster (Order Processing Fees) »

Defendant: Ticketmaster

Consumers who purchased tickets from ticketmaster.com from October 21, 1999 to February 27, 2013 and paid for an Order Processing Fee may be eligible for refunds.   Consumer who also purchased UPS delivery for the tickets during the class period may also be eligible for additional discounts on future UPS ticket… Learn More.

Ticketmaster (Order Processing Fees) »

Defendant: Ticketmaster
Source: http://settlement.livenation.com/

Consumers who purchased tickets from ticketmaster.com from October 21, 1999 to February 27, 2013 and paid for an Order Processing Fee may be eligible for refunds.   Consumer who also purchased UPS delivery for the tickets during the class period may also be eligible for additional discounts on future UPS ticket deliveries.  Ticketmaster reached a $403.3 million settlement over allegations of excessive and deceptive fees.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Volkswagen (3.0-liter diesel emissions) »

Defendant: Volkswagen

Volkswagen agree to buyback 3.0 liter diesel cars to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding Volkswagen’s false advertising of the emissions level of the 3.0 liter diesel Volkswagen and Audi vehicles.  Consumers who have purchased or leased those models may be eligible for a cash payment and (a) have… Learn More.

Volkswagen (3.0-liter diesel emissions) »

Defendant: Volkswagen
Source: https://www.ftc.gov/enforcement/cases-proceedings/refunds/volkswagen-30l-settlement

Volkswagen agree to buyback 3.0 liter diesel cars to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding Volkswagen’s false advertising of the emissions level of the 3.0 liter diesel Volkswagen and Audi vehicles.  Consumers who have purchased or leased those models may be eligible for a cash payment and (a) have Volkswagen buy back their car or (b) accept the Approved Emissions Modification.

Deadline to register as former owner is May 1, 2017

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Nissan (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Nissan

Alleges that certain Nissan vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Nissan vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between November 11, 2008 and September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who… Learn More.

Nissan (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Nissan

Alleges that certain Nissan vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Nissan vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between November 11, 2008 and September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who currently own or lease certain Nissan vehicles as of September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution up to $250 cash or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Order Approving Class Settlement was entered on Feb. 28, 2018.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Honda (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Honda

Alleges that certain Honda vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Honda vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between November 11, 2008 and September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who currently own or lease… Learn More.

Honda (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Honda

Alleges that certain Honda vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Honda vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between November 11, 2008 and September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who currently own or lease certain Nissan vehicles as of September 19, 2017 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Order Approving Class Settlement was entered on Feb. 28, 2018.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Interline Brands, Inc. (DuraPro Toilet Connector) »

Defendant: Interline Brands, Inc.

Consumers who own or lease a residence that installed DuraPro Toilet Connector may be eligible for $4 cash per Toilet Connector (with a maximum of $20). Class members who experience property damage due to failure of Coupling Nut on the DuraPro Toilet Connector may be eligible to receive cash award… Learn More.

Interline Brands, Inc. (DuraPro Toilet Connector) »

Defendant: Interline Brands, Inc.

Consumers who own or lease a residence that installed DuraPro Toilet Connector may be eligible for $4 cash per Toilet Connector (with a maximum of $20). Class members who experience property damage due to failure of Coupling Nut on the DuraPro Toilet Connector may be eligible to receive cash award up to 30% of the property damage expenses. The company reached a settlement of allegations that the DuraPro Toilet Connectors have defective plastic Coupling Nuts.

Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 19, 2018. 

Deadline to file replacement claim is 2 years after final approval order.

Deadline to file property damage claim is 4 years after final approval order.

http://www.duraprotoiletconnectorsettlement.com/

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Honda (CR-V) »

Defendant: Honda

Alleges that certain 2015 Honda CR-V vehicles are prone to unpleasant vibrations. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for repairs. Final Hearing is Nov. 6, 2018.    Learn More.

Honda (CR-V) »

Defendant: Honda

Alleges that certain 2015 Honda CR-V vehicles are prone to unpleasant vibrations. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for repairs.

Final Hearing is Nov. 6, 2018.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Ford (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Ford

Alleges that certain Ford vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Ford vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between June 19, 2014 and September 5, 2018 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who currently own or lease… Learn More.

Ford (Takata Airbags) »

Defendant: Ford

Alleges that certain Ford vehicles have defective airbags made by Takata. Consumers who purchased or leased certain Ford vehicles and sold or returned that vehicle between June 19, 2014 and September 5, 2018 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses. Consumers who currently own or lease certain Ford vehicles as of September 8, 2018 may be eligible for residual distribution or reimbursement of reasonable expenses.

Final Fairness Hearing is Dec. 11, 2018.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Southwest (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: Southwest

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and December 20, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $15 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing. Final Fairness Hearing is… Learn More.

Southwest (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: Southwest

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and December 20, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $15 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing.

Final Fairness Hearing is Mar. 22, 2019.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

American Airlines (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: American Airlines

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and June 14, 2018 may be eligible for $45 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing. Final Fairness Hearing is Mar. 22, 2019.    Learn More.

American Airlines (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: American Airlines

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and June 14, 2018 may be eligible for $45 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing.

Final Fairness Hearing is Mar. 22, 2019.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

MoneyGram (Fraud) »

Defendant: MoneyGram

MoneyGram agreed to $125 million settlementfor failing to stop fraud-related money transfers, including those committed by its own agents.  The company reached a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of violating previous FTC’s 2009 order and breaching 2012 Department of Justice deferred prosecution agreement.    Learn More.

MoneyGram (Fraud) »

Defendant: MoneyGram
Source: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2018/11/moneygram-agrees-pay-125-million-settle-allegations-company

MoneyGram agreed to $125 million settlementfor failing to stop fraud-related money transfers, including those committed by its own agents.  The company reached a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of violating previous FTC’s 2009 order and breaching 2012 Department of Justice deferred prosecution agreement.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp (401(k) plan) »

Defendant: Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp

Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp. agreed to a $21.9 million settlement over claims that it mismanaged its employees’ retirement savings by offering an in-house 401(k) plan that had excessive fees and poor investments options. Deustche Bank Matched Savings Plan participants and beneficiaries whose individual accounts were invested in the disputed investments… Learn More.

Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp (401(k) plan) »

Defendant: Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp

Deutsche Bank Americas Holding Corp. agreed to a $21.9 million settlement over claims that it mismanaged its employees’ retirement savings by offering an in-house 401(k) plan that had excessive fees and poor investments options. Deustche Bank Matched Savings Plan participants and beneficiaries whose individual accounts were invested in the disputed investments between December 21, 2009 and August 14, 2018 may be eligible for payment. The case is Moreno v. Deutsche Bank Am. Holding Corp., E.D.N.Y., No. 1:15-cv-09936.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

CenturyLink (repsweb.centurylink.com) »

Defendant: CenturyLink

Current and former CenturyLink customers whose CenturyLink bills were exposed online at a URL beginning with “repsweb.centurylink.com” between March 5, 2017 and May 18, 2017 may be eligible for credit monitoring. Current and former CenturyLink customers whose CenturyLink bills that were exposed online at a URL beginning with “repsweb.centurylink.com” and… Learn More.

CenturyLink (repsweb.centurylink.com) »

Defendant: CenturyLink

Current and former CenturyLink customers whose CenturyLink bills were exposed online at a URL beginning with “repsweb.centurylink.com” between March 5, 2017 and May 18, 2017 may be eligible for credit monitoring. Current and former CenturyLink customers whose CenturyLink bills that were exposed online at a URL beginning with “repsweb.centurylink.com” and included information about their DirecTV Service between March 5, 2017 and May 18, 2017 may be eligible for payment and credit monitoring. Class members will automatically receive the benefits.

Final Approval Hearing is Jun. 14, 2019

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Navy Federal Credit Union (Overdraft Fees) »

Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union

Current and former account holders who were charged overdraft fees when they had sufficient funds available in the ledger balance to cover the transaction between July 22, 2012 and November 20, 2017 (except for accountholders who enrolled in overdraft protection after February 13, 2017) may be eligible for payment. Class members will automatically… Learn More.

Navy Federal Credit Union (Overdraft Fees) »

Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union

Current and former account holders who were charged overdraft fees when they had sufficient funds available in the ledger balance to cover the transaction between July 22, 2012 and November 20, 2017 (except for accountholders who enrolled in overdraft protection after February 13, 2017) may be eligible for payment. Class members will automatically receive payment.

Final Approval Hearing is May 20, 2019.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

SquareTrade (Protection Plan) »

Defendant: SquareTrade

Consumers who bought a SquareTrade Protection Plan on Amazon between April 20, 2012 and October 8, 2018 may be eligible for $10 SquareTrade Protection Plan discount coupon per plan purchased. Class members will automatically receive payment. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to adequately disclose their terms… Learn More.

SquareTrade (Protection Plan) »

Defendant: SquareTrade

Consumers who bought a SquareTrade Protection Plan on Amazon between April 20, 2012 and October 8, 2018 may be eligible for $10 SquareTrade Protection Plan discount coupon per plan purchased. Class members will automatically receive payment. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to adequately disclose their terms and conditions of its Protection Plans prior to purchase.

Final Approval Hearing is Jun. 21, 2019.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×

Johnson and Johnson Services, Inc. (Infants’ Tylenol) »

Defendant: Johnson and Johnson Services, Inc.

Alleges misrepresentation on the Infants’ Tylenol packaging as being different from Children’s Tylenol when the formula is the same in both products. The case is Elkies v. Johnson and Johnson Services, Inc., Case No. 2:17-cv-07320, United States District Court for the Central District of California.    Learn More.

Johnson and Johnson Services, Inc. (Infants’ Tylenol) »

Defendant: Johnson and Johnson Services, Inc.

Alleges misrepresentation on the Infants’ Tylenol packaging as being different from Children’s Tylenol when the formula is the same in both products. The case is Elkies v. Johnson and Johnson Services, Inc., Case No. 2:17-cv-07320, United States District Court for the Central District of California.

Learn More.

Tags/Keywords

×