Deadlines Calendar

« April 2021 »

S M T W T F S
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  

View Large Calendar


Class Action by Status


'pending' Listing

Southwest (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: Southwest

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and December 20, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $15 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing. Final Fairness Hearing is… Learn More.

Southwest (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: Southwest

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and December 20, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $15 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing.

Final Fairness Hearing is Mar. 22, 2019.

Learn More.

×

American Airlines (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: American Airlines

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and June 14, 2018 may be eligible for $45 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing. Final Fairness Hearing is Mar. 22, 2019.    Learn More.

American Airlines (Price Fixing) »

Defendant: American Airlines

Consumers who bought flight tickets for travel within the U.S. from American, Delta, Southwest, United, Continental, or US Airways between July 1, 2011 and June 14, 2018 may be eligible for $45 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of price fixing.

Final Fairness Hearing is Mar. 22, 2019.

Learn More.

×

MoneyGram (Fraud) »

Defendant: MoneyGram

MoneyGram agreed to $125 million settlementfor failing to stop fraud-related money transfers, including those committed by its own agents.  The company reached a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of violating previous FTC’s 2009 order and breaching 2012 Department of Justice deferred prosecution agreement.    Learn More.

MoneyGram (Fraud) »

Defendant: MoneyGram
Source: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2018/11/moneygram-agrees-pay-125-million-settle-allegations-company

MoneyGram agreed to $125 million settlementfor failing to stop fraud-related money transfers, including those committed by its own agents.  The company reached a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of violating previous FTC’s 2009 order and breaching 2012 Department of Justice deferred prosecution agreement.

Learn More.

×

AT&T (Unlimited Data) »

Defendant: AT&T

Current and former AT&T consumers who signed up for unlimited data plan prior to 2011 may be eligible for a partial refund.  The company reached a $60 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of failing to disclose to consumers that AT&T would reduce their data speeds when consumers… Learn More.

AT&T (Unlimited Data) »

Defendant: AT&T

Current and former AT&T consumers who signed up for unlimited data plan prior to 2011 may be eligible for a partial refund.  The company reached a $60 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of failing to disclose to consumers that AT&T would reduce their data speeds when consumers reach a certain amount of data use in their unlimited data plan.

Learn More.

×

Wells Fargo (Consumer Report) »

Defendant: Wells Fargo

Consumers who were subject to consumer report prepared by First Advantage background check platform between June 1, 2015 and January 24, 2016 may be eligible for cash payment. The case is Rivera v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, Case No. CGC-17-562174, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. Final Approval… Learn More.

Wells Fargo (Consumer Report) »

Defendant: Wells Fargo

Consumers who were subject to consumer report prepared by First Advantage background check platform between June 1, 2015 and January 24, 2016 may be eligible for cash payment. The case is Rivera v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, Case No. CGC-17-562174, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco.

Final Approval Hearing is May 1, 2020.

Learn More.

×

Fashion Nova (Mail Order Rule) »

Defendant: Fashion Nova

Fashion Nova agreed to $9.3 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of failing to ship merchandise in a timely manner and failing to issue prompt refunds to consumers.    Learn More.

Fashion Nova (Mail Order Rule) »

Defendant: Fashion Nova
Source: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2020/04/fashion-nova-will-pay-93-million-consumer-refunds-settle-ftc

Fashion Nova agreed to $9.3 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of failing to ship merchandise in a timely manner and failing to issue prompt refunds to consumers.

Learn More.

×

Progressive Leasing (Rent-to-own) »

Defendant: Progressive Leasing

Progressive Leasing agreed to a $175 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of misleading consumers on the real price of the rent-to-own payment plans.     Learn More.

Progressive Leasing (Rent-to-own) »

Defendant: Progressive Leasing

Progressive Leasing agreed to a $175 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of misleading consumers on the real price of the rent-to-own payment plans. 

Learn More.

×

Santander (Subprime Auto Loans) »

Defendant: Santander

Santander agreed to a $550 million settlement regarding Santander’s auto loan practices. According to the California Attorney General and attorneys general of 33 states, Santander approved loans that it expected consumers to default on and exposed borrowers to unnecessary high risk.    Learn More.

Santander (Subprime Auto Loans) »

Defendant: Santander
Source: https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-becerra-announces-over-550-million-settlement-against-nation%E2%80%99s

Santander agreed to a $550 million settlement regarding Santander’s auto loan practices. According to the California Attorney General and attorneys general of 33 states, Santander approved loans that it expected consumers to default on and exposed borrowers to unnecessary high risk.

Learn More.

×

Sterling Infosystems, Inc. (FCRA) »

Defendant: Sterling Infosystems, Inc.

Individuals who were subject to background check report prepared by Sterling between December 14, 2013 and December 19, 2019 that included addresses that were more than seven years before the date of the report and where at least one address had a “high risk” indicator may be eligible for cash… Learn More.

Sterling Infosystems, Inc. (FCRA) »

Defendant: Sterling Infosystems, Inc.

Individuals who were subject to background check report prepared by Sterling between December 14, 2013 and December 19, 2019 that included addresses that were more than seven years before the date of the report and where at least one address had a “high risk” indicator may be eligible for cash payment. 

Final Fairness Hearing is Sep. 22, 2020.

Learn More.

×

Transamerica (Life Insurance) »

Defendant: Transamerica

Consumers who owned TransUltra 115 98/99” policies and/or the “TransSurvivor 115 97/98/99” policies as of December 31, 2019 may be eligible for credit or cash payment. The company reached a settlement over allegations of increasing Monthly Deduction Rate against the policies terms. Final Fairness Hearing is Aug. 31, 2020.    Learn More.

Transamerica (Life Insurance) »

Defendant: Transamerica

Consumers who owned TransUltra 115 98/99” policies and/or the “TransSurvivor 115 97/98/99” policies as of December 31, 2019 may be eligible for credit or cash payment. The company reached a settlement over allegations of increasing Monthly Deduction Rate against the policies terms.

Final Fairness Hearing is Aug. 31, 2020.

Learn More.

×

LoanCare LLC (Late Fees) »

Defendant: LoanCare LLC

Alleges that LoanCare erroneously charged late fees based on a percentage of the PITI (principal, interest, taxes and insurance) when the contract limits late fees to a percentage of P&I (principal and interest). Class members will automatically receive payment or credit to their account. Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 27,… Learn More.

LoanCare LLC (Late Fees) »

Defendant: LoanCare LLC

Alleges that LoanCare erroneously charged late fees based on a percentage of the PITI (principal, interest, taxes and insurance) when the contract limits late fees to a percentage of P&I (principal and interest). Class members will automatically receive payment or credit to their account.

Final Fairness Hearing is Oct. 27, 2020.

Learn More.

×

Capital One (Out-of-Network ATM) »

Defendant: Capital One

Alleges Capital One breached its contract with accountholders. Current and former Capital One customers who were charged Out of Network ATM Balance Inquiry Fee during the class period (various dates depending on the state) may be eligible for cash payment or account credit. Class members will automatically receive payment. Final… Learn More.

Capital One (Out-of-Network ATM) »

Defendant: Capital One

Alleges Capital One breached its contract with accountholders. Current and former Capital One customers who were charged Out of Network ATM Balance Inquiry Fee during the class period (various dates depending on the state) may be eligible for cash payment or account credit. Class members will automatically receive payment.

Final Approval Hearing is January 11, 2021.

Learn More.

×

Navy Federal Credit Union (NSF Fees) »

Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union

Alleges Navy Federal Credit Union breached its contract with accountholders. Current and former Navy Federal customers who were charged Representment NSF fees between January 28, 2014 and October 27, 2020 may be eligible for cash payment or account credit. Class members will automatically receive payment or credit to their account.… Learn More.

Navy Federal Credit Union (NSF Fees) »

Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union

Alleges Navy Federal Credit Union breached its contract with accountholders. Current and former Navy Federal customers who were charged Representment NSF fees between January 28, 2014 and October 27, 2020 may be eligible for cash payment or account credit. Class members will automatically receive payment or credit to their account.

Final Approval Hearing is Mar. 26, 2021.

Learn More.

×

Think Finance (Loans) »

Defendant: Think Finance

Think Finance agreed to a settlement regarding its lending practices. The lawsuit alleges Think Finance violated federal and state laws by making loans with annual interest in excess of state law or lending without a license. Class members may be eligible for loan forgiveness or cash payment.  Final Fairness Hearing… Learn More.

Think Finance (Loans) »

Defendant: Think Finance

Think Finance agreed to a settlement regarding its lending practices. The lawsuit alleges Think Finance violated federal and state laws by making loans with annual interest in excess of state law or lending without a license. Class members may be eligible for loan forgiveness or cash payment. 

Final Fairness Hearing is Mar. 25, 2021.

Learn More.

×

Activehours, Inc. (Earnin) »

Defendant: Activehours, Inc.

Consumers who incurred a third-party overdraft or insufficient funds fee associated with an Earnin withdrawal between September 3, 2015 and May 28, 2020 may be eligible for cash payment. Class members will automatically receive payment. Final Approval Hearing is Mar. 25, 2021.    Learn More.

Activehours, Inc. (Earnin) »

Defendant: Activehours, Inc.

Consumers who incurred a third-party overdraft or insufficient funds fee associated with an Earnin withdrawal between September 3, 2015 and May 28, 2020 may be eligible for cash payment. Class members will automatically receive payment.

Final Approval Hearing is Mar. 25, 2021.

Learn More.

×