Deadlines Calendar

« December 2024 »

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

View Large Calendar


Class Action by Status


'closed' Listing

Bank of America (overdraft fees) »

Defendant: Bank of America

Bank of America will pay $8 million to settle a case alleging the bank charged unfair overdraft and non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees on some transactions between May 19, 2017, and Feb. 16, 2023. Bank of America customers who, during this period, paid and were not refunded an overdraft and/or NSF… Read More »

Bank of America (overdraft fees) »

Defendant: Bank of America

Bank of America will pay $8 million to settle a case alleging the bank charged unfair overdraft and non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees on some transactions between May 19, 2017, and Feb. 16, 2023. Bank of America customers who, during this period, paid and were not refunded an overdraft and/or NSF fee assessed when a check or ACH (electronic) transaction was reprocessed by the bank may be eligible for payment.

Read More »

×

Pfizer (EpiPen) »

Defendant: Pfizer

Consumers who paid for branded or authorized generic EpiPens between August 24, 2011 and November 1, 2020 may be eligible for cash payment. The company reached a settlement over allegations of antitrust violations.     Read More »

Pfizer (EpiPen) »

Defendant: Pfizer

Consumers who paid for branded or authorized generic EpiPens between August 24, 2011 and November 1, 2020 may be eligible for cash payment. The company reached a settlement over allegations of antitrust violations. 

Read More »

×

Boeing Employee Credit Union (Overdraft Fees) »

Defendant: Boeing Employee Credit Union

Alleges Boeing Employee Credit Union violated Washington law. Current and former checking accountholders who were charged overdraft or NSF fees when they had sufficient funds available in the ledger balance to cover the transaction between August 2, 2015 and July 1, 2020 may be eligible for cash payment or account credit. Current and former checking… Read More »

Boeing Employee Credit Union (Overdraft Fees) »

Defendant: Boeing Employee Credit Union

Alleges Boeing Employee Credit Union violated Washington law. Current and former checking accountholders who were charged overdraft or NSF fees when they had sufficient funds available in the ledger balance to cover the transaction between August 2, 2015 and July 1, 2020 may be eligible for cash payment or account credit. Current and former checking accountholders who were charged more than one NSF fees on the same transaction between August 2, 2013 and July 1, 2020 may be eligible for cash payment or account credit. Class members will automatically receive payment or credit to their account.

Final Approval Hearing is Sep. 24, 2021.

The Court granted final approval of the Settlement on Sep. 27, 2021.

Read More »

×

ABB Optical Group, LLC. (Contact Lenses) »

Defendant: ABB Optical Group, LLC.

Consumers who bought contact lenses disposable contact lenses manufactured by Alcon, JJVC, CVI, or B&L between June 1, 2013 and December 4, 2018 and subject to the Unilateral Pricing Policy may be eligible for cash payment. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of antitrust violations.    Read More »

ABB Optical Group, LLC. (Contact Lenses) »

Defendant: ABB Optical Group, LLC.

Consumers who bought contact lenses disposable contact lenses manufactured by Alcon, JJVC, CVI, or B&L between June 1, 2013 and December 4, 2018 and subject to the Unilateral Pricing Policy may be eligible for cash payment. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of antitrust violations.

Read More »

×

Navy Federal Credit Union (NSF Fees) »

Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union

Alleges Navy Federal Credit Union breached its contract with accountholders. Current and former Navy Federal customers who were charged Representment NSF fees between January 28, 2014 and October 27, 2020 may be eligible for cash payment or account credit. Class members will automatically receive payment or credit to their account.… Read More »

Navy Federal Credit Union (NSF Fees) »

Defendant: Navy Federal Credit Union

Alleges Navy Federal Credit Union breached its contract with accountholders. Current and former Navy Federal customers who were charged Representment NSF fees between January 28, 2014 and October 27, 2020 may be eligible for cash payment or account credit. Class members will automatically receive payment or credit to their account.

Final Approval Hearing is Mar. 26, 2021.

Read More »

×

Capital One (Out-of-Network ATM) »

Defendant: Capital One

Alleges Capital One breached its contract with accountholders. Current and former Capital One customers who were charged Out of Network ATM Balance Inquiry Fee during the class period (various dates depending on the state) may be eligible for cash payment or account credit. Class members will automatically receive payment. Final… Read More »

Capital One (Out-of-Network ATM) »

Defendant: Capital One

Alleges Capital One breached its contract with accountholders. Current and former Capital One customers who were charged Out of Network ATM Balance Inquiry Fee during the class period (various dates depending on the state) may be eligible for cash payment or account credit. Class members will automatically receive payment.

Final Approval Hearing is January 11, 2021.

Read More »

×

Chase (SCRA) »

Defendant: Chase

The lawsuit alleges Chase failed to reduce the interest rate on credit cards of servicemember cardholders in violation of Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. Class members will automatically receive payment or credit to their account. Final Fairness Hearing was Oct. 1, 2020.    Read More »

Chase (SCRA) »

Defendant: Chase

The lawsuit alleges Chase failed to reduce the interest rate on credit cards of servicemember cardholders in violation of Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. Class members will automatically receive payment or credit to their account.

Final Fairness Hearing was Oct. 1, 2020.

Read More »

×

Wells Fargo (Patriot Land Transfer) »

Defendant: Wells Fargo; Patriot Land Transfer

Mortgage borrowers whose loans were closed by Patriot Land Transfer between January 1, 2013 and April 13, 2015 may be eligible to receive back a certain percentage of amounts paid to Patriot Land Transfer.  Wells Fargo reached a settlement over allegations of Patriot Land Transfer paying unlawful benefits to certain Wells… Read More »

Wells Fargo (Patriot Land Transfer) »

Defendant: Wells Fargo; Patriot Land Transfer

Mortgage borrowers whose loans were closed by Patriot Land Transfer between January 1, 2013 and April 13, 2015 may be eligible to receive back a certain percentage of amounts paid to Patriot Land Transfer.  Wells Fargo reached a settlement over allegations of Patriot Land Transfer paying unlawful benefits to certain Wells Fargo employees in exchange of referrals to Patriot Land Transfer.

Final Fairness Hearing is Sep. 17, 2020.

Read More »

×

Transamerica (Life Insurance) »

Defendant: Transamerica

Consumers who owned TransUltra 115 98/99” policies and/or the “TransSurvivor 115 97/98/99” policies as of December 31, 2019 may be eligible for credit or cash payment. The company reached a settlement over allegations of increasing Monthly Deduction Rate against the policies terms. Final Fairness Hearing is Aug. 31, 2020.    Read More »

Transamerica (Life Insurance) »

Defendant: Transamerica

Consumers who owned TransUltra 115 98/99” policies and/or the “TransSurvivor 115 97/98/99” policies as of December 31, 2019 may be eligible for credit or cash payment. The company reached a settlement over allegations of increasing Monthly Deduction Rate against the policies terms.

Final Fairness Hearing is Aug. 31, 2020.

Read More »

×

Wells Fargo (Home Loan Modification) »

Defendant: Wells Fargo

Alleges that between 2010 and 2018, Wells Fargo miscalculated attorneys’ fees for the trial loan modification under HAMP and erroneously denied home loan modification or repayment plan to qualified consumers, leading to foreclosure. Consumers who were not offered the trial loan modification between 2010 and 2018 due to Wells Fargo’s… Read More »

Wells Fargo (Home Loan Modification) »

Defendant: Wells Fargo

Alleges that between 2010 and 2018, Wells Fargo miscalculated attorneys’ fees for the trial loan modification under HAMP and erroneously denied home loan modification or repayment plan to qualified consumers, leading to foreclosure. Consumers who were not offered the trial loan modification between 2010 and 2018 due to Wells Fargo’s error and lost their home to foreclosure may be eligible for cash payment.

Final Fairness Hearing is Aug. 20, 2020.

Read More »

×

Santander (Subprime Auto Loans) »

Defendant: Santander

Santander agreed to a $550 million settlement regarding Santander’s auto loan practices. According to the California Attorney General and attorneys general of 33 states, Santander approved loans that it expected consumers to default on and exposed borrowers to unnecessary high risk.    Read More »

Santander (Subprime Auto Loans) »

Defendant: Santander
Source: https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general-becerra-announces-over-550-million-settlement-against-nation%E2%80%99s

Santander agreed to a $550 million settlement regarding Santander’s auto loan practices. According to the California Attorney General and attorneys general of 33 states, Santander approved loans that it expected consumers to default on and exposed borrowers to unnecessary high risk.

Read More »

×

HSN (TCPA) »

Defendant: HSN

Consumers who received an automated telemarketing call from HSN between April 1, 2015 and December 12, 2019 may be eligible for cash payment. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Class members will automatically receive payment. Final Hearing is Aug. 14, 2020.… Read More »

HSN (TCPA) »

Defendant: HSN

Consumers who received an automated telemarketing call from HSN between April 1, 2015 and December 12, 2019 may be eligible for cash payment. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Class members will automatically receive payment.

Final Hearing is Aug. 14, 2020.

Read More »

×

Jaguar (Land Rover Front Air Springs) »

Defendant: Jaguar Land Rover North America

Alleges that certain 2003-2006 Land Rover Range Rover have defective front air springs in the electronic air suspension. Consumers who purchased or leased these models on or before December 31, 2018 may be eligible for various rates of reimbursement for replacement of front air spring depending on the years in… Read More »

Jaguar (Land Rover Front Air Springs) »

Defendant: Jaguar Land Rover North America

Alleges that certain 2003-2006 Land Rover Range Rover have defective front air springs in the electronic air suspension. Consumers who purchased or leased these models on or before December 31, 2018 may be eligible for various rates of reimbursement for replacement of front air spring depending on the years in service and mileage range at time of replacement.

Final Fairness Hearing is Feb. 3, 2020.

Read More »

×

Progressive Leasing (Rent-to-own) »

Defendant: Progressive Leasing

Progressive Leasing agreed to a $175 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of misleading consumers on the real price of the rent-to-own payment plans.     Read More »

Progressive Leasing (Rent-to-own) »

Defendant: Progressive Leasing
Source: https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/blog/2020/04/how-much-sofa-read-fine-print

Progressive Leasing agreed to a $175 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of misleading consumers on the real price of the rent-to-own payment plans. 

Read More »

×

Fashion Nova (Mail Order Rule) »

Defendant: Fashion Nova

Fashion Nova agreed to $9.3 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of failing to ship merchandise in a timely manner and failing to issue prompt refunds to consumers.    Read More »

Fashion Nova (Mail Order Rule) »

Defendant: Fashion Nova
Source: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2020/04/fashion-nova-will-pay-93-million-consumer-refunds-settle-ftc

Fashion Nova agreed to $9.3 million settlement with the Federal Trade Commission over allegations of failing to ship merchandise in a timely manner and failing to issue prompt refunds to consumers.

Read More »

×