Deadlines Calendar

« November 2019 »

S M T W T F S
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Class Action by Status


'closed' Listing

Tacoma Screw Products (FACTA) »

Defendant: Tacoma Screw Products

Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions and received an electronically-printed receipt that displayed the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card between July 1, 2014 and July 14, 2016 at Tacoma Screw Products store may be eligible for $100 Tacoma Screw Products gift card. The company reached… Read More »

Tacoma Screw Products (FACTA) »

Defendant: Tacoma Screw Products

Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions and received an electronically-printed receipt that displayed the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card between July 1, 2014 and July 14, 2016 at Tacoma Screw Products store may be eligible for $100 Tacoma Screw Products gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.

Read More »

Tags/Keywords

×

Tristar (Power Pressure Cookers) »

Defendant: Tristar Products, Inc.

Consumers who purchased certain models of Tristar power pressure cookers between March 1, 2013 and January 19, 2018 may be eligible for warranty extension and $72.50 credit for a purchase of a specified Tristar product. The company reached a settlement over allegations that the power pressure cookers were defective.    Read More »

Tristar (Power Pressure Cookers) »

Defendant: Tristar Products, Inc.

Consumers who purchased certain models of Tristar power pressure cookers between March 1, 2013 and January 19, 2018 may be eligible for warranty extension and $72.50 credit for a purchase of a specified Tristar product. The company reached a settlement over allegations that the power pressure cookers were defective.

Read More »

Tags/Keywords

×

Nissan (Timing Chain) »

Defendant: Nissan

The lawsuit alleges that certain 2004-2006 Nissan Altima with VQ35 engine vehicles, 2004-2008 Nissan Maxima vehicles, 2004-2009 Nissan Quest vehicles, 2005-2007 Nissan Frontier with VQ40 engine vehicles, 2005-2007 Nissan Pathfinder vehicles, and 2005-2007 Nissan Xterra vehicles have a timing belt defect. California and Washington consumers who purchased or leased these models… Read More »

Nissan (Timing Chain) »

Defendant: Nissan

The lawsuit alleges that certain 2004-2006 Nissan Altima with VQ35 engine vehicles, 2004-2008 Nissan Maxima vehicles, 2004-2009 Nissan Quest vehicles, 2005-2007 Nissan Frontier with VQ40 engine vehicles, 2005-2007 Nissan Pathfinder vehicles, and 2005-2007 Nissan Xterra vehicles have a timing belt defect. California and Washington consumers who purchased or leased these models may be eligible for partial reimbursement of the repairs costs or a voucher towards the purchase of a new Nissan vehicle. 

Read More »

Tags/Keywords

×

MEI (LifeTime Engine Guarantee) »

Defendant: Car Sense Inc. (now MEI)

Consumers who bought a vehicle from Car Sense Inc. (now MEI) and accepted the LifeTime Engine Guarantee may be eligible for $30 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violating the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.    Read More »

MEI (LifeTime Engine Guarantee) »

Defendant: Car Sense Inc. (now MEI)

Consumers who bought a vehicle from Car Sense Inc. (now MEI) and accepted the LifeTime Engine Guarantee may be eligible for $30 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violating the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.

Read More »

Tags/Keywords

×

Frontier California Inc. (Late Payment Charges) »

Defendant: Frontier California Inc

Former Frontier Califiornia or Verizon California residential telephone service consumers who paid a late payment charge between December 1, 2008 and February 21, 2018 may be eligible for payment. Current eligible California Frontier or Verizon residential telephone service consumers who paid a late payment charge between December 1, 2008 and February… Read More »

Frontier California Inc. (Late Payment Charges) »

Defendant: Frontier California Inc

Former Frontier Califiornia or Verizon California residential telephone service consumers who paid a late payment charge between December 1, 2008 and February 21, 2018 may be eligible for payment. Current eligible California Frontier or Verizon residential telephone service consumers who paid a late payment charge between December 1, 2008 and February 21, 2018 will automatically receive credit to their bill. The company reached a settlement over allegations that the late payment charges were unlawful contractual penalties under California law.  

Read More »

Tags/Keywords

×

Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. (Cruise Fare) »

Defendant: Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.

Marriott Vacation Club Destinations Exchange Program members who booked a cruise through International Cruise & Excursion Gallery, Inc. (“ICE”) between January 1, 2010 and February 23, 2018 may be eligible for 50 % cash value of the non-commissionable cruise fare (“NCF”) to in cash, or 75% cash value of NCF in… Read More »

Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. (Cruise Fare) »

Defendant: Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.

Marriott Vacation Club Destinations Exchange Program members who booked a cruise through International Cruise & Excursion Gallery, Inc. (“ICE”) between January 1, 2010 and February 23, 2018 may be eligible for 50 % cash value of the non-commissionable cruise fare (“NCF”) to in cash, or 75% cash value of NCF in Exchange Program Plus Points, or 75% cash value of NCF in ICE gift card.  Alleges that the companies charged NCF to consumers who booked cruises using exchange points and failed to provide cruises.

Read More »

Tags/Keywords

×

Pella (ProLine Casement Windows) »

Defendant: Pella

Alleges that Pella ProLine brand aluminum clad wood casement, awning and/or transom windows manufactured between 1991 and 2009 are defective, allowing water intrusion that subsequently damages the property.  Current or former owners of the property with Pella Proline windows installed with water related damages might be eligible for payment.    Read More »

Pella (ProLine Casement Windows) »

Defendant: Pella

Alleges that Pella ProLine brand aluminum clad wood casement, awning and/or transom windows manufactured between 1991 and 2009 are defective, allowing water intrusion that subsequently damages the property.  Current or former owners of the property with Pella Proline windows installed with water related damages might be eligible for payment.

Read More »

Tags/Keywords

×

Bank of America (FCRA) »

Defendant: Bank of America

Alleges that Bank of America improperly accessed consumer credit reports of former Bank of America customers after their account relationship with Bank of America ended.  Accountholders whose information was accessed between August 21, 2010 and July 7, 2017 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $1.6 million… Read More »

Bank of America (FCRA) »

Defendant: Bank of America

Alleges that Bank of America improperly accessed consumer credit reports of former Bank of America customers after their account relationship with Bank of America ended.  Accountholders whose information was accessed between August 21, 2010 and July 7, 2017 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $1.6 million settlement.

Read More »

Tags/Keywords

×

Dish (Telemarketing) »

Defendant: Dish Network

Individuals on the national Do Not Call Registry who received telemarketing calls between May 11, 2010 and August 1, 2011 from a DISH retailer selling DISH subscriptions may be eligible for a share of the $61 million judgment. The jury found DISH liable for the telemarketing calls to 18,066 telephone numbers on… Read More »

Dish (Telemarketing) »

Defendant: Dish Network

Individuals on the national Do Not Call Registry who received telemarketing calls between May 11, 2010 and August 1, 2011 from a DISH retailer selling DISH subscriptions may be eligible for a share of the $61 million judgment. The jury found DISH liable for the telemarketing calls to 18,066 telephone numbers on the Do Not Call Registry.  

Read More »

Tags/Keywords

×

Global Tel*Link Corporation (TCPA) »

Defendant: Global Tel*Link Corporation

Individuals who received automated calls from Global Tel*Link to their cell phones between December 5, 2010 and April 7, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $8.8 million settlement. Thecompany reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.      Read More »

Global Tel*Link Corporation (TCPA) »

Defendant: Global Tel*Link Corporation

Individuals who received automated calls from Global Tel*Link to their cell phones between December 5, 2010 and April 7, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $8.8 million settlement. Thecompany reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.  

Read More »

Tags/Keywords

×

Ford (PowerShift Transmission) »

Defendant: Ford

The lawsuit alleges that certain 2011-2016 Ford Fiesta and 2012-2016 Ford Focus vehicles with dual-clutch PowerShift transmissions are defective. Consumers who purchased or leased these models on or before April 25, 2017 may be eligible for cash payment or Vehicle Discount Certificate. The settlement was approved on October 18, 2017.    Read More »

Ford (PowerShift Transmission) »

Defendant: Ford

The lawsuit alleges that certain 2011-2016 Ford Fiesta and 2012-2016 Ford Focus vehicles with dual-clutch PowerShift transmissions are defective. Consumers who purchased or leased these models on or before April 25, 2017 may be eligible for cash payment or Vehicle Discount Certificate.

The settlement was approved on October 18, 2017.

Read More »

Tags/Keywords

×

Viridian Energy (Variable Rate) »

Defendant: Viridian Energy

Alleges that Viridian Energy charged excessive variable rates for gas and electricity. Current and former Viridian Energy consumers enrolled in the variable rate plan between July 1, 2009 and December 31, 2016 may be eligible for cash payment or account credit.    Read More »

Viridian Energy (Variable Rate) »

Defendant: Viridian Energy

Alleges that Viridian Energy charged excessive variable rates for gas and electricity. Current and former Viridian Energy consumers enrolled in the variable rate plan between July 1, 2009 and December 31, 2016 may be eligible for cash payment or account credit.

Read More »

Tags/Keywords

×

ExactTarget LLC (Simply Fashion Text Messages) »

Defendant: ExactTarget LLC

Consumers who received unsolicited text messages from Simply Fashion between July 23, 2009 and September 30, 2013 may be eligible for a share of the $6.2 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.      Read More »

ExactTarget LLC (Simply Fashion Text Messages) »

Defendant: ExactTarget LLC

Consumers who received unsolicited text messages from Simply Fashion between July 23, 2009 and September 30, 2013 may be eligible for a share of the $6.2 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.  

Read More »

Tags/Keywords

×

Venture Data, LLC and Public Opinions Strategies, LLC (TCPA) »

Defendant: Venture Data, LLC and Public Opinions Strategies, LLC.

Individuals who received automated calls from Venture Data to their cell phones on June 11, 2014, or August 19, 2014 or September 9, 2014 regarding a Public Opinion Strategies survey may be eligible for a share of the $2.1 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of… Read More »

Venture Data, LLC and Public Opinions Strategies, LLC (TCPA) »

Defendant: Venture Data, LLC and Public Opinions Strategies, LLC.

Individuals who received automated calls from Venture Data to their cell phones on June 11, 2014, or August 19, 2014 or September 9, 2014 regarding a Public Opinion Strategies survey may be eligible for a share of the $2.1 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.  

Read More »

Tags/Keywords

×

Guess (Advertising) »

Defendant: Guess

California residents who bought products from Guess Factory that were advertised with a higher reference price between April 17, 2011 and February 26, 2018 may be eligible for a merchandise voucher. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misleadingly labeling the price of the merchandise.    Read More »

Guess (Advertising) »

Defendant: Guess

California residents who bought products from Guess Factory that were advertised with a higher reference price between April 17, 2011 and February 26, 2018 may be eligible for a merchandise voucher. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misleadingly labeling the price of the merchandise.

Read More »

Tags/Keywords

×