Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC (Telephone Recording) »
Defendant: Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC
California residents who received one or more telephone calls from Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC between March 14, 2012 and March 27, 2013 and was not informed that the call may be monitored or recorded may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $6 million settlement.Bass Pro Outdoor… Read More »
Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC (Telephone Recording) »
Defendant: Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC
California residents who received one or more telephone calls from Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC between March 14, 2012 and March 27, 2013 and was not informed that the call may be monitored or recorded may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $6 million settlement.Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC (Telephone Recording)
×Capital One (Telephone Recording) »
Defendant: Capital One
California, Florida, Maryland, Nevada, or New Hampshire residents who received one or more telephone calls from Capital One between July 13, 2006 and March 31, 2012 and was not informed that the call may be monitored or recorded may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $3 million… Read More »
Capital One (Telephone Recording) »
Defendant: Capital One
California, Florida, Maryland, Nevada, or New Hampshire residents who received one or more telephone calls from Capital One between July 13, 2006 and March 31, 2012 and was not informed that the call may be monitored or recorded may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $3 million settlement.
×Peterson’s Nelnet, LLC (TCPA) »
Defendant: Peterson’s Nelnet, LLC
US residents who received fax advertisements between January 3, 2007 and January 3, 2011 from Peterson’s Nelnet, LLC may be eligible for up to $500 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Peterson’s Nelnet, LLC (TCPA) »
Defendant: Peterson’s Nelnet, LLC
US residents who received fax advertisements between January 3, 2007 and January 3, 2011 from Peterson’s Nelnet, LLC may be eligible for up to $500 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company (Life Insurance) »
Defendant: Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company
Consumers who purchased an Indexed Universal Life Insurance Policy (“IUL Policy”) issued by Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company or OM Financial Life Insurance Company between January 1, 2007 and March 31, 2014 may be eligible for either Interest Enhancement or cash refund. Consumers with an active IUL policy as… Read More »
Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company (Life Insurance) »
Defendant: Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company
Consumers who purchased an Indexed Universal Life Insurance Policy (“IUL Policy”) issued by Fidelity and Guaranty Life Insurance Company or OM Financial Life Insurance Company between January 1, 2007 and March 31, 2014 may be eligible for either Interest Enhancement or cash refund. Consumers with an active IUL policy as of March 31, 2014 may be eligible to receive Interest Enhancement. Consumers with an inactive IUL Policy as of March 31, 2014 may be eligible for up to 60% of the surrender charge that was paid when the IUL Policy was surrendered or lapsed. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresenting the IUL Policy as investments and failing to adequately describe the costs, benefits and terms of the IUL policies.
×Suave (Keratin Infusion Smoothing Kit) »
Defendant: Suave
Consumers who purchased the Smoothing Kit before February 17, 2014 may be eligible for up to $10 cash. Consumers who were injured may be eligible for reimbursement from the Injury Fund. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the safety of the product. Read More »
Suave (Keratin Infusion Smoothing Kit) »
Defendant: Suave
Consumers who purchased the Smoothing Kit before February 17, 2014 may be eligible for up to $10 cash. Consumers who were injured may be eligible for reimbursement from the Injury Fund. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the safety of the product.
×Vibram (FiveFingers) »
Defendant: Vibram
Consumers who purchased certain Vibram shoes from March 21, 2008 and May 27, 2014 may be eligible for up to $94 cash per pair purchased. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the health benefits of certain shoes. Read More »
Vibram (FiveFingers) »
Defendant: Vibram
Source: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304655304579547781850080084
Consumers who purchased certain Vibram shoes from March 21, 2008 and May 27, 2014 may be eligible for up to $94 cash per pair purchased. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the health benefits of certain shoes.
×Dakota Growers (Dreamfields Pasta) »
Defendant: Dakota Growers
Consumers who purchased Dreamfields Pasta products with a label that contains “glycemic index” or “digestible carbs” between February 2004 and July 1, 2014 may be eligible for $1.99 cash per box, with maximum of 15 boxes for in-store purchases. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising “glycemic… Read More »
Dakota Growers (Dreamfields Pasta) »
Defendant: Dakota Growers
Consumers who purchased Dreamfields Pasta products with a label that contains “glycemic index” or “digestible carbs” between February 2004 and July 1, 2014 may be eligible for $1.99 cash per box, with maximum of 15 boxes for in-store purchases. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising “glycemic index” or “digestible carbs” without scientific support.
×Kashi and Bear Naked (“All Natural”) »
Defendant: Kashi and Bear Naked
California consumers who purchased certain Kashi products from August 24, 2007 to May 1, 2014 may be eligible for up to $25 cash. California consumers who purchased certain Bear Naked products between September 21, 2007 and May 1, 2014 may be eligible for up to $10 cash. The companies reached… Read More »
Kashi and Bear Naked (“All Natural”) »
Defendant: Kashi and Bear Naked
California consumers who purchased certain Kashi products from August 24, 2007 to May 1, 2014 may be eligible for up to $25 cash. California consumers who purchased certain Bear Naked products between September 21, 2007 and May 1, 2014 may be eligible for up to $10 cash. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the product as “all natural,” “nothing artificial,” and “100% natural” even though they contained one or more allegedly synthetic ingredients.
×Stonebridge Life Insurance (Text Message) »
Defendant: Stonebridge Life Insurance
Consumers who received unauthorized text messages from 650-283-0793 between November 28, 2010 and December 2, 2010 may be eligible for up to $155 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Stonebridge Life Insurance (Text Message) »
Defendant: Stonebridge Life Insurance
Consumers who received unauthorized text messages from 650-283-0793 between November 28, 2010 and December 2, 2010 may be eligible for up to $155 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Best Buy (Automated Phone Call) »
Defendant: Best Buy
US residents who are on the National Do-Not-Call list and Washington residents who received a pre-recorded telephone call regarding Best Buy’s Reward Zone certificate reminders and go digital policy between October 8, 2007 and November 30, 2011 may be eligible for up to $100 cash. Read More »
Best Buy (Automated Phone Call) »
Defendant: Best Buy
US residents who are on the National Do-Not-Call list and Washington residents who received a pre-recorded telephone call regarding Best Buy’s Reward Zone certificate reminders and go digital policy between October 8, 2007 and November 30, 2011 may be eligible for up to $100 cash.
×Innovative Dining Group, LLC (Kobe Beef) »
Defendant: Innovative Dining Group, LLC
California consumers who purchased any menu item that was advertised to contain “Kobe” beef between October 3, 2008 and May 30, 2014 at certain restaurants may be eligible for $15 or $20 gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising “Kobe” beef as containing beef from… Read More »
Innovative Dining Group, LLC (Kobe Beef) »
Defendant: Innovative Dining Group, LLC
California consumers who purchased any menu item that was advertised to contain “Kobe” beef between October 3, 2008 and May 30, 2014 at certain restaurants may be eligible for $15 or $20 gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising “Kobe” beef as containing beef from the “Wagyu” bloodline of cattle in the Kobe region of Japan.
×Wells Fargo (Text Message) »
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Non-Wells Fargo customers who received text messages regarding wire transfers from Wells Fargo between December 18, 2008 and June 20, 2013 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $950,000 settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Wells Fargo (Text Message) »
Defendant: Wells Fargo
Non-Wells Fargo customers who received text messages regarding wire transfers from Wells Fargo between December 18, 2008 and June 20, 2013 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $950,000 settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×DRAMS »
Defendant:
Consumers who bought DRAM or a device containing DRAM between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2002 from certain companies may be eligible for at least $10 cash. The companies reached a $310 million settlement over allegations of price fixing. Read More »
Hydroxycut »
Defendant: Hydroxycut
Consumers who bought certain Hydroxycut products between July 20, 2008 and March 19, 2014 may be eligible for a full refund or $50 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the efficacy of the products. Read More »
Hydroxycut »
Defendant: Hydroxycut
Consumers who bought certain Hydroxycut products between July 20, 2008 and March 19, 2014 may be eligible for a full refund or $50 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the efficacy of the products.
×Vivint Inc. (Automate Phone Call) »
Defendant: Vivint Inc.
US residents who are on the National Do-Not-Call list or Vivint’s internal Do-Not-Call list who received a pre-recorded telephone call regarding Vivint products or services on or after September 17, 2008 may be eligible for up to $500 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the… Read More »
Vivint Inc. (Automate Phone Call) »
Defendant: Vivint Inc.
US residents who are on the National Do-Not-Call list or Vivint’s internal Do-Not-Call list who received a pre-recorded telephone call regarding Vivint products or services on or after September 17, 2008 may be eligible for up to $500 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×