Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Talbots (Credit Card) »
Defendant: Talbots
Consumers who opened a Talbots branded credit card account and used the account between June 18, 2012 and February 25, 2013 may be eligible for $3.70 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to make disclosures required by the Truth in Lending Act. Read More »
Talbots (Credit Card) »
Defendant: Talbots
Consumers who opened a Talbots branded credit card account and used the account between June 18, 2012 and February 25, 2013 may be eligible for $3.70 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to make disclosures required by the Truth in Lending Act.
×Synovus Bank (Overdraft Fees) »
Defendant: Synovus Bank
Georgia consumers may be eligible for a share of a $24 million settlement if they were charged one or more overdraft fees in connection with a debit card or ATM transaction between July 10, 2004 and February 3, 2014. The bank reached a settlement over allegations of charging excessive overdraft… Read More »
Synovus Bank (Overdraft Fees) »
Defendant: Synovus Bank
Georgia consumers may be eligible for a share of a $24 million settlement if they were charged one or more overdraft fees in connection with a debit card or ATM transaction between July 10, 2004 and February 3, 2014. The bank reached a settlement over allegations of charging excessive overdraft fees in violation of Georgia’s usury laws.
×Heel, Inc. (Homeopathic Products) »
Defendant: Heel, Inc.
Consumers who bought “homeopathic” products from December 21, 2008 to February 5, 2014 may be eligible for up to $150. The company reached a settlement over allegations of false or deceptive advertisements. Read More »
Heel, Inc. (Homeopathic Products) »
Defendant: Heel, Inc.
Consumers who bought “homeopathic” products from December 21, 2008 to February 5, 2014 may be eligible for up to $150. The company reached a settlement over allegations of false or deceptive advertisements.
×Ticketmaster (Order Processing Fees) »
Defendant: Ticketmaster
Consumers who purchased tickets from ticketmaster.com from October 21, 1999 to February 27, 2013 and paid for an Order Processing Fee may be eligible for refunds. Consumer who also purchased UPS delivery for the tickets during the class period may also be eligible for additional discounts on future UPS ticket… Read More »
Ticketmaster (Order Processing Fees) »
Defendant: Ticketmaster
Source: http://settlement.livenation.com/
Consumers who purchased tickets from ticketmaster.com from October 21, 1999 to February 27, 2013 and paid for an Order Processing Fee may be eligible for refunds. Consumer who also purchased UPS delivery for the tickets during the class period may also be eligible for additional discounts on future UPS ticket deliveries. Ticketmaster reached a $403.3 million settlement over allegations of excessive and deceptive fees.
×Michaels (Zip Code) »
Defendant: Michaels
Alleges that customers were asked for a ZIP code in violation of their privacy rights between May 23, 2007 and February 12, 2014 at Michaels stores in Massachusetts. Class members may be eligible to receive either a $10 or $25 voucher for use at a Massachusetts Michaels retail store. Final… Read More »
Michaels (Zip Code) »
Defendant: Michaels
Alleges that customers were asked for a ZIP code in violation of their privacy rights between May 23, 2007 and February 12, 2014 at Michaels stores in Massachusetts. Class members may be eligible to receive either a $10 or $25 voucher for use at a Massachusetts Michaels retail store. Final Approval Hearing is May 20, 2014.
×Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Vioxx) »
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Consumers who purchased Vioxx before October 1, 2004 may be eligible for up to $50 cash or reimbursement of actual out-of-pocket costs. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the greater benefits of Vioxx in comparison to less expensive pain medicines. Read More »
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Vioxx) »
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Consumers who purchased Vioxx before October 1, 2004 may be eligible for up to $50 cash or reimbursement of actual out-of-pocket costs. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the greater benefits of Vioxx in comparison to less expensive pain medicines.
×MoGreet (Text Spam) »
Defendant: MoGreet, Inc.
Consumers who received unauthorized text messages from certain retailers may be eligible for up to $105. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
MoGreet (Text Spam) »
Defendant: MoGreet, Inc.
Consumers who received unauthorized text messages from certain retailers may be eligible for up to $105. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Live Nation (New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act) »
Defendant: Live Nation
Consumers who purchased a ticket from livenation.com or ticketmaster.com from June 23, 2003 to June 15, 2011 may be eligible for 3 “Free Ticket Vouchers” and a $5 coupon code for a future ticket purchase. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act… Read More »
Live Nation (New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act) »
Defendant: Live Nation
Consumers who purchased a ticket from livenation.com or ticketmaster.com from June 23, 2003 to June 15, 2011 may be eligible for 3 “Free Ticket Vouchers” and a $5 coupon code for a future ticket purchase. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and New Jersey Truth in Consumer Contract, Warranty, and Notice Act.
×Apple (In-app Charges) »
Defendant: Apple
Apple will provide $32 million in consumer refunds to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding Apple’s billing of children’s in-app purchases without parental consent. Consumers whose iTunes account were charged for certain in-app purchase of game currency by a minor without the accountholder’s knowledge or permission will receive an… Read More »
Apple (In-app Charges) »
Defendant: Apple
Apple will provide $32 million in consumer refunds to settle a Federal Trade Commission complaint regarding Apple’s billing of children’s in-app purchases without parental consent. Consumers whose iTunes account were charged for certain in-app purchase of game currency by a minor without the accountholder’s knowledge or permission will receive an email from Apple on how to file a claim. Consumers can also contact the Federal Trade Commission for more information.
×Intellicorp (Background Check) »
Defendant: Intellicorp
The lawsuit alleges that Intellicorp gave inaccurate criminal background reports to employers and failed to notify individuals that their criminal history information was reported to employers in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who were not given notification of the report may be eligible for up to $50. … Read More »
Intellicorp (Background Check) »
Defendant: Intellicorp
The lawsuit alleges that Intellicorp gave inaccurate criminal background reports to employers and failed to notify individuals that their criminal history information was reported to employers in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Individuals who were not given notification of the report may be eligible for up to $50. Individuals whose criminal history information reports were inaccurate may be eligible for up to $2000.
×Lamps Plus (ZIP Code) »
Defendant: Lamps Plus
Alleges that customers were asked for a ZIP code in violation of their privacy rights between November 9, 2005 and January 8, 2014 at Lamps Plus stores in California. Class members may be eligible to receive either a $10 voucher for use at a California Lamps Plus retail store. Read More »
Lamps Plus (ZIP Code) »
Defendant: Lamps Plus
Alleges that customers were asked for a ZIP code in violation of their privacy rights between November 9, 2005 and January 8, 2014 at Lamps Plus stores in California. Class members may be eligible to receive either a $10 voucher for use at a California Lamps Plus retail store.
×Palm Beach Mall (Text Message) »
Defendant: Upscale Events by Mosaic, LLC, d/b/a The Mosaic Group, and Palm Beach Mall Holdings LLC
Consumers who received unauthorized text messages promoting an August 21, 2012 job fair for the New Palm Beach Mall in August 2012 may be eligible for up to $150 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Palm Beach Mall (Text Message) »
Defendant: Upscale Events by Mosaic, LLC, d/b/a The Mosaic Group, and Palm Beach Mall Holdings LLC
Consumers who received unauthorized text messages promoting an August 21, 2012 job fair for the New Palm Beach Mall in August 2012 may be eligible for up to $150 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Duracell (Ultra Advanced or Ultra Power batteries) »
Defendant: The Gillette Company and The Procter & Gamble Company
Consumers who bought Duracell Ultra Advanced or Ultra Power batteries after June 2009 may be eligible for up to $12 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising that its product lasted longer. Read More »
Duracell (Ultra Advanced or Ultra Power batteries) »
Defendant: The Gillette Company and The Procter & Gamble Company
Consumers who bought Duracell Ultra Advanced or Ultra Power batteries after June 2009 may be eligible for up to $12 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising that its product lasted longer.
×Honda (Engine Misfire) »
Defendant: American Honda
The lawsuit alleges that the 6-cylinder engine with Variable Cylinder Management of certain 2008-2013 Honda vehicles are defective. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for cash reimbursement for repair expenses and warranty extension. Read More »
Honda (Engine Misfire) »
Defendant: American Honda
The lawsuit alleges that the 6-cylinder engine with Variable Cylinder Management of certain 2008-2013 Honda vehicles are defective. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for cash reimbursement for repair expenses and warranty extension.
×Diamond Wireless (FACTA) »
Defendant: Diamond Wireless
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions at Diamond Wireless retail locations and received an electronically-printed receipt that contained the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card between April 24, 2011 and July 30, 2013 may be eligible to receive up to $500 cash. The company reached… Read More »
Diamond Wireless (FACTA) »
Defendant: Diamond Wireless
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions at Diamond Wireless retail locations and received an electronically-printed receipt that contained the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card between April 24, 2011 and July 30, 2013 may be eligible to receive up to $500 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.
×