Deadlines Calendar

« May 2024 »

S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

View Large Calendar


Class Action by Status


'closed' Listing

Direct Digital LLC (Instaflex Joint Support) »

Defendant: Direct Digital LLC

Consumers who bought Instaflex products may be eligible for $15 per bottle, with a maximum of seven bottles.  Consumers who paid for shipping and handling for a Instaflex sample trial and did not purchase Instaflex may be eligible for $5. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising… Read More »

Direct Digital LLC (Instaflex Joint Support) »

Defendant: Direct Digital LLC

Consumers who bought Instaflex products may be eligible for $15 per bottle, with a maximum of seven bottles.  Consumers who paid for shipping and handling for a Instaflex sample trial and did not purchase Instaflex may be eligible for $5. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising Instaflex Joint Support products were “scientifically formulated” and clinically tested” to improve joint health. 

Read More »

×

Rust-Oleum (Restore Products) »

Defendant: Rust-Oleum

Consumers who bought certain Restore Products between January 1, 2008 and October 20, 2016 may be eligible for reimbursement of the purchased product.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of selling defective products.    Read More »

Rust-Oleum (Restore Products) »

Defendant: Rust-Oleum

Consumers who bought certain Restore Products between January 1, 2008 and October 20, 2016 may be eligible for reimbursement of the purchased product.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of selling defective products.

Read More »

×

ACE American Insurance Co. (TCPA) »

Defendant: ACE American Insurance Co.

Nationstar Mortgage or BB&T Bank current and former customers who received a telemarketing call from ACE American Insurance Co. to a number registered with the National Do Not Call Registry on or after October 16, 2013 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $9.7 million settlement. The… Read More »

ACE American Insurance Co. (TCPA) »

Defendant: ACE American Insurance Co.

Nationstar Mortgage or BB&T Bank current and former customers who received a telemarketing call from ACE American Insurance Co. to a number registered with the National Do Not Call Registry on or after October 16, 2013 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $9.7 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.  

Read More »

×

Skeeter Snacks (Nut Free Products) »

Defendant: Skeeter Snacks

Consumers who bought certain Skeeter Snacks Nut Free products between July 1, 2013 and June 29, 2017 may be eligible for a full refund based on their purchase receipts or up to $3 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “All Natural” when… Read More »

Skeeter Snacks (Nut Free Products) »

Defendant: Skeeter Snacks

Consumers who bought certain Skeeter Snacks Nut Free products between July 1, 2013 and June 29, 2017 may be eligible for a full refund based on their purchase receipts or up to $3 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “All Natural” when not all the ingredients were natural.

Read More »

×

HSBC Card Services (Telephone Recording) »

Defendant: HSBC Card Services, Inc.

California residents who received a call from or on behalf of HSBC Card Services Inc. between March 23, 2009 and May 1, 2012 that was monitored or recorded may be eligible for a share of the $13 million settlement.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of recording telephone calls… Read More »

HSBC Card Services (Telephone Recording) »

Defendant: HSBC Card Services, Inc.

California residents who received a call from or on behalf of HSBC Card Services Inc. between March 23, 2009 and May 1, 2012 that was monitored or recorded may be eligible for a share of the $13 million settlement.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of recording telephone calls without notice or consent of California residents.

Read More »

×

Wild Planet (Tuna) »

Defendant: Wild Planet

Consumers who bought Wild Planet or Sustainable Seas’ can of tuna between November 5, 2011 and May 12, 2017 may be eligible for a pro rata share of $1.7 million settlement.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of under-filling the amount of tuna in its cans.    Read More »

Wild Planet (Tuna) »

Defendant: Wild Planet

Consumers who bought Wild Planet or Sustainable Seas’ can of tuna between November 5, 2011 and May 12, 2017 may be eligible for a pro rata share of $1.7 million settlement.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of under-filling the amount of tuna in its cans.

Read More »

×

New York Life (TCPA) »

Defendant: New York Life

Consumers who received automated calls or to a number registered with the National Do Not Call Registry from New York Life on or after May 13, 2012 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $3.3 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of… Read More »

New York Life (TCPA) »

Defendant: New York Life

Consumers who received automated calls or to a number registered with the National Do Not Call Registry from New York Life on or after May 13, 2012 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $3.3 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.  

Read More »

×

AT&T U-Verse (TCPA) »

Defendant: AT&T

Consumers who received automated calls to their cell phones regarding U-verse service and made a complaint regarding the call before November 18, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $1.9 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection… Read More »

AT&T U-Verse (TCPA) »

Defendant: AT&T

Consumers who received automated calls to their cell phones regarding U-verse service and made a complaint regarding the call before November 18, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $1.9 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.  

Read More »

×

Harbor Freight (Advertising) »

Defendant: Harbor Freight

Consumers who purchased merchandise from Harbor Freight between April 8, 2011 and December 15, 2016 that was advertised with a higher suggested retail price next to a lower current price may be eligible for cash or gift card based on the amount they “saved” or spent on their purchases. The… Read More »

Harbor Freight (Advertising) »

Defendant: Harbor Freight

Consumers who purchased merchandise from Harbor Freight between April 8, 2011 and December 15, 2016 that was advertised with a higher suggested retail price next to a lower current price may be eligible for cash or gift card based on the amount they “saved” or spent on their purchases. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising merchandise as being on sale when merchandise was not being sold at the higher suggested retail price for at least 28 of the last 90 days prior to purchase.

Read More »

×

Wells Fargo (Student Loans TCPA) »

Defendant: Wells Fargo

Consumers who received automated or prerecorded call or text on their cell phones from Wells Fargo regarding student loans between April 21, 2011 and December 19, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $2 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of… Read More »

Wells Fargo (Student Loans TCPA) »

Defendant: Wells Fargo

Consumers who received automated or prerecorded call or text on their cell phones from Wells Fargo regarding student loans between April 21, 2011 and December 19, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $2 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. 

 

Read More »

×

Discover Financial Services (TCPA) »

Defendant: Discover Financial Services

Consumers whose contact information was purchased by Discover Home Loans and received prerecorded calls regarding Discover financial products between June 1, 2012 and July 31, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the… Read More »

Discover Financial Services (TCPA) »

Defendant: Discover Financial Services

Consumers whose contact information was purchased by Discover Home Loans and received prerecorded calls regarding Discover financial products between June 1, 2012 and July 31, 2015 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.  

Read More »

×

Staples (Rewards) »

Defendant: Staples

Staples Rewards members who purchased a Rewards-eligible product and a non-Rewards eligible product in the same transaction and used an item-specific coupon on the non-Rewards eligible product between March 24, 2009 and April 25, 2017 may be eligible for $10 in Staples Rewards. The company reached a settlement over allegations… Read More »

Staples (Rewards) »

Defendant: Staples

Staples Rewards members who purchased a Rewards-eligible product and a non-Rewards eligible product in the same transaction and used an item-specific coupon on the non-Rewards eligible product between March 24, 2009 and April 25, 2017 may be eligible for $10 in Staples Rewards. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to disclose its rewards coupon policy.

Read More »

×

Seterus (Forced-Placed Insurance) »

Defendant: Seterus

Seterus agreed to a settlement regarding its lender-placed insurance (“LPI”) practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that Seterus forced borrowers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard, flood, or wind-only insurance. Borrowers who paid for LPI Policy issued by QBE Specialty Insurance Co. between August 19, 2010 and November 4, 2016 may be eligible… Read More »

Seterus (Forced-Placed Insurance) »

Defendant: Seterus

Seterus agreed to a settlement regarding its lender-placed insurance (“LPI”) practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that Seterus forced borrowers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard, flood, or wind-only insurance. Borrowers who paid for LPI Policy issued by QBE Specialty Insurance Co. between August 19, 2010 and November 4, 2016 may be eligible to receive back up to 10.5% of the premium. Borrowers who paid for LPI Policy issued by Praetorian Insurance Co. or QBE Insurance Corporation between August 19, 2010 and November 4, 2016may be eligible to receive back up to 6% of the premium.

Read More »

×

Drew’s Salad Dressings (All-Natural) »

Defendant: Drew’s LLC

Consumers who bought certain Drew’s All-Natural Salad Dressings and Quick Marinades between June 15, 2011 and February 15, 2017 may be eligible for $3 coupon and $0.50 per product purchased, with maximum of $10 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “all natural”… Read More »

Drew’s Salad Dressings (All-Natural) »

Defendant: Drew’s LLC

Consumers who bought certain Drew’s All-Natural Salad Dressings and Quick Marinades between June 15, 2011 and February 15, 2017 may be eligible for $3 coupon and $0.50 per product purchased, with maximum of $10 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “all natural” when not all the ingredients were natural.

Read More »

×

PennyMac Loan Services, LLC (Forced-Placed Insurance) »

Defendant: PennyMac Loan Services, LLC

PennyMac Loan Services agreed to a settlement regarding its lender-placed insurance (“LPI”) practices on homeowners.  The lawsuit alleges that PennyMac Loan Services forced borrowers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard, flood, or wind-only insurance.  Borrowers who paid for LPI Policy issued by QBE Specialty, Seattle Specialty, or Southwest Business Corporation between… Read More »

PennyMac Loan Services, LLC (Forced-Placed Insurance) »

Defendant: PennyMac Loan Services, LLC

PennyMac Loan Services agreed to a settlement regarding its lender-placed insurance (“LPI”) practices on homeowners.  The lawsuit alleges that PennyMac Loan Services forced borrowers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard, flood, or wind-only insurance.  Borrowers who paid for LPI Policy issued by QBE Specialty, Seattle Specialty, or Southwest Business Corporation between February 1, 2011 and October 18, 2016 may be eligible to receive back up to 10.5% of the premium.  Borrowers who paid for LPI Policy issued by Praetorian Insurance Co., QBE Insurance , Balboa, or Meritplan between February 1, 2011 and October 18, 2016 may be eligible to receive back up to 5.5% of the premium.

Read More »

×