Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
LoanCare LLC (Forced-Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: LoanCare LLC
LoanCare LLC agreed to a settlement regarding its lender-placed insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that LoanCare LLC forced borrowers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard, flood, flood gap or wind-only insurance. The mortgage servicer received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies (“LPI Policy”) for the homeowners. … Read More »
LoanCare LLC (Forced-Placed Insurance) »
Defendant: LoanCare LLC
LoanCare LLC agreed to a settlement regarding its lender-placed insurance practices on homeowners. The lawsuit alleges that LoanCare LLC forced borrowers to purchase unnecessary expensive hazard, flood, flood gap or wind-only insurance. The mortgage servicer received kickbacks from the insurers for choosing the more-expensive policies (“LPI Policy”) for the homeowners. Borrowers who paid for flood or wind LPI Policy between January 1, 2009 and October 19, 2016 or for a hazard LPI Policy on or after June 1, 2013 may be eligible to receive back up to 5% of the premium. Borrowers who paid for hazard LPI Policy on or before May 31, 2013 may be eligible to receive back up to 8% of the premium.
×SuperAmerica (TCPA) »
Defendant: SuperAmerica
Consumers who received unsolicited, automated text messages from SuperAmerica between January 1, 2012 and April 1, 2015 may be eligible for $50 cash and $50 SuperAmerica gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
SuperAmerica (TCPA) »
Defendant: SuperAmerica
Consumers who received unsolicited, automated text messages from SuperAmerica between January 1, 2012 and April 1, 2015 may be eligible for $50 cash and $50 SuperAmerica gift card. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Universal Nutrition (“Made in USA”) »
Defendant: Universal Protein Supplements Corporation
Consumers who bought certain Universal Nutrition products with the “Made in USA” label between March 21, 2012 and December 28, 2016 may be eligible for $20 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of improperly labeling and advertising the product as “Made in USA” when it contained some foreign… Read More »
Universal Nutrition (“Made in USA”) »
Defendant: Universal Protein Supplements Corporation
Consumers who bought certain Universal Nutrition products with the “Made in USA” label between March 21, 2012 and December 28, 2016 may be eligible for $20 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of improperly labeling and advertising the product as “Made in USA” when it contained some foreign made parts.
×Nissan (Altima) »
Defendant: Nissan
The lawsuit alleges certain 2008-2009 Nissan Altima models have defective dashboards that crack, melt, and become sticky in the state of Florida. Class members must visit a Nissan dealership by April 29, 2017 for replacement or documentation of defect in order to be eligible for reimbursement. Florida residents who bought or… Read More »
Nissan (Altima) »
Defendant: Nissan
The lawsuit alleges certain 2008-2009 Nissan Altima models have defective dashboards that crack, melt, and become sticky in the state of Florida. Class members must visit a Nissan dealership by April 29, 2017 for replacement or documentation of defect in order to be eligible for reimbursement. Florida residents who bought or leased those models before April 1, 2017 may be eligible for reimbursement of dashboard replacement costs minus $250.
×Sony (VAIO Trackpad) »
Defendant: Sony
California and New Jersey consumers who bough certain Sony VAIO Laptop models between March 16, 2006 and January 4, 2017 may be eligible for up to $200. The company reached a settlement over allegations of a defectively designing the trackpad of certain VAIO laptops. Read More »
Sony (VAIO Trackpad) »
Defendant: Sony
California and New Jersey consumers who bough certain Sony VAIO Laptop models between March 16, 2006 and January 4, 2017 may be eligible for up to $200. The company reached a settlement over allegations of a defectively designing the trackpad of certain VAIO laptops.
×Revlon (DNA Advantage) »
Defendant: Revlon
Consumers who bought Revlon’s DNA Advantage products between April 25, 2011 and June 30, 2016 may be eligible for $3 per product purchased. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising their products. Read More »
Revlon (DNA Advantage) »
Defendant: Revlon
Consumers who bought Revlon’s DNA Advantage products between April 25, 2011 and June 30, 2016 may be eligible for $3 per product purchased. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising their products.
×Art.com (Sale) »
Defendant: Art.com
Consumers who bought any product from www.art.com, www.posters.com, and/or www.allposters.com between February 12, 2012 and June 9, 2016 may be eligible for $10 Art.com voucher. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising merchandise as being on sale when not. Class members will automatically receive the voucher when… Read More »
Art.com (Sale) »
Defendant: Art.com
Consumers who bought any product from www.art.com, www.posters.com, and/or www.allposters.com between February 12, 2012 and June 9, 2016 may be eligible for $10 Art.com voucher. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising merchandise as being on sale when not. Class members will automatically receive the voucher when the settlement becomes final.
Final Approval Hearing is Aug. 9, 2017.
×Quorn Foods (Mycoprotein) »
Defendant: Quorn Foods, Inc.
Consumers who bought Quorn products between January 26, 2012 and December 14, 2016 may be eligible for up to $200 cash or a full refund. The company reached a settlement of allegations of falsely advertising the ingredients of the food products. Read More »
Quorn Foods (Mycoprotein) »
Defendant: Quorn Foods, Inc.
Consumers who bought Quorn products between January 26, 2012 and December 14, 2016 may be eligible for up to $200 cash or a full refund. The company reached a settlement of allegations of falsely advertising the ingredients of the food products.
×Wireless Subscribers Nationwide (Unauthorized Texts) »
Defendant: Post SMS. Co. Americas, Inc.; Post SMS Co. Qube, Inc.; CF Enterprises Pty., Ltd.
Alleges that the companies sent and billed unauthorized text messages to wireless telephone subscribers. Current and former subscribers who received unauthorized text messages from Message Claim Shortcode or Message Claim Program associated with CF Enterprises between January 31, 2011 and November 3, 2016 may be eligible for about $65 per… Read More »
Wireless Subscribers Nationwide (Unauthorized Texts) »
Defendant: Post SMS. Co. Americas, Inc.; Post SMS Co. Qube, Inc.; CF Enterprises Pty., Ltd.
Alleges that the companies sent and billed unauthorized text messages to wireless telephone subscribers. Current and former subscribers who received unauthorized text messages from Message Claim Shortcode or Message Claim Program associated with CF Enterprises between January 31, 2011 and November 3, 2016 may be eligible for about $65 per unauthorized messages up to maximum of three unauthorized messages. Current and former subscribers who were charged for certain subscriptions or received unauthorized text messages from Premium Short Code associated with PostSMS between January 31, 2011 and November 3, 2016 may be eligible for about $30 per unauthorized subscription charge.
×Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. Inc. (Hydroxycut) »
Defendant: Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. Inc.
Consumers who bough certain Hydroxycut products between May 2, 2009 and February 15, 2017 may be eligible for a full refund based on their purchase receipts or $14 per bottle, with a maximum up to 2 bottles per household. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the… Read More »
Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. Inc. (Hydroxycut) »
Defendant: Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. Inc.
Consumers who bough certain Hydroxycut products between May 2, 2009 and February 15, 2017 may be eligible for a full refund based on their purchase receipts or $14 per bottle, with a maximum up to 2 bottles per household. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the effectiveness the products.
×Millennium Products, Inc. (Kombucha) »
Defendant: Millennium Products, Inc.; Whole Foods Market, Inc.
Consumers who purchased certain kombucha products between March 11, 2011 and February 27, 2017 may be eligible for $3.50 per product, with maximum of $60 cash or $3.50 product voucher, with maximum of $60 product voucher. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of mislabeling the products with “Antioxidant” when… Read More »
Millennium Products, Inc. (Kombucha) »
Defendant: Millennium Products, Inc.; Whole Foods Market, Inc.
Consumers who purchased certain kombucha products between March 11, 2011 and February 27, 2017 may be eligible for $3.50 per product, with maximum of $60 cash or $3.50 product voucher, with maximum of $60 product voucher. The companies reached a settlement over allegations of mislabeling the products with “Antioxidant” when they do not contain antioxidants and understating the sugar content.
×Burlington Coat Factory (Advertising) »
Defendant: Burlington Coat Factory of California LLC
California residents who purchased merchandise from Burlington Coat Factory between July 1, 2011 and January 26, 2017 that was advertised with “Compare At” price or “Our Low” price may be eligible for $5 cash or $7.50 Burlington Coat Factory merchandise certificate. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising… Read More »
Burlington Coat Factory (Advertising) »
Defendant: Burlington Coat Factory of California LLC
California residents who purchased merchandise from Burlington Coat Factory between July 1, 2011 and January 26, 2017 that was advertised with “Compare At” price or “Our Low” price may be eligible for $5 cash or $7.50 Burlington Coat Factory merchandise certificate. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising merchandise as being on sale when “Compare” price was higher than sales price for the same item at other retailers.
×Navient (TCPA) »
Defendant: Navient
Consumers who received automated or prerecorded call on their cell phones from Navient between May 4, 2011 and January 26, 2016 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $19 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Navient (TCPA) »
Defendant: Navient
Consumers who received automated or prerecorded call on their cell phones from Navient between May 4, 2011 and January 26, 2016 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $19 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Provide Commerce, Inc. (ProFlowers.com) »
Defendant: Provide Commerce, Inc.
California consumers who purchased a floral arrangement from Provide Commerce, Inc. between July 1, 2009 and April 30, 2016 may be eligible for $10 gift code for use on ProFlowers.com. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to disclose that certain floral arrangements are not assembled when delivered.… Read More »
Provide Commerce, Inc. (ProFlowers.com) »
Defendant: Provide Commerce, Inc.
California consumers who purchased a floral arrangement from Provide Commerce, Inc. between July 1, 2009 and April 30, 2016 may be eligible for $10 gift code for use on ProFlowers.com. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to disclose that certain floral arrangements are not assembled when delivered. Class members will automatically receive payment when the settlement becomes final.
Final Fairness Hearing is Aug. 14, 2017.
×Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
Consumers who received automated or prerecorded call on their cell phones from Real Time Resolutions, Inc. between August 30, 2009 and April 10, 2017 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $1.3 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer… Read More »
Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (TCPA) »
Defendant: Real Time Resolutions, Inc.
Consumers who received automated or prerecorded call on their cell phones from Real Time Resolutions, Inc. between August 30, 2009 and April 10, 2017 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $1.3 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
Final Fairness Hearing is Aug. 23, 2017.
×