Deadlines Calendar

« May 2024 »

S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  

View Large Calendar


Class Action by Status


'closed' Listing

American Eagle (TCPA) »

Defendant: American Eagle

Consumers who received unsolicited, automated text messages from American Eagle between April 8, 2010 and January 24, 2017 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $14.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.      Read More »

American Eagle (TCPA) »

Defendant: American Eagle

Consumers who received unsolicited, automated text messages from American Eagle between April 8, 2010 and January 24, 2017 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $14.5 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.  

Read More »

×

Kia (Sorento Crankshaft) »

Defendant: Kia

The lawsuit alleges that the crankshaft pulley bolt and balancer of certain 2003-2006 Kia Sorento vehicles with 3.5 liter engine were defectively designed and broke, causing damage to other engine components.  Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for repairs, warranty extension, or cash reimbursement for out-of-pocket… Read More »

Kia (Sorento Crankshaft) »

Defendant: Kia

The lawsuit alleges that the crankshaft pulley bolt and balancer of certain 2003-2006 Kia Sorento vehicles with 3.5 liter engine were defectively designed and broke, causing damage to other engine components.  Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for repairs, warranty extension, or cash reimbursement for out-of-pocket repair expenses. 

Read More »

×

Home City Ice Company (Antitrust) »

Defendant: Home City Ice Company

Residents of certain states who bought packaged ice indirectly from Home City Ice Company or other defendants between January 1, 2001 and March 6, 2006 may be eligible to receive $6 total for 1 to 6 bags of ice purchased or $12 total for 7 or more bags of ice… Read More »

Home City Ice Company (Antitrust) »

Defendant: Home City Ice Company

Residents of certain states who bought packaged ice indirectly from Home City Ice Company or other defendants between January 1, 2001 and March 6, 2006 may be eligible to receive $6 total for 1 to 6 bags of ice purchased or $12 total for 7 or more bags of ice purchased.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of price-fixing.

Read More »

×

Salov North America Corp. (Filippo Berio Olive Oil) »

Defendant: Salov North America Corp.

Consumers who bought certain Filippo Berio Olive Oil products with the “Imported from Italy” label between May 23, 2010 and June 30, 2015 may be eligible for $2 total for 1 to 4 products purchased or $5 total for up to 10 products purchased. The company reached a settlement over… Read More »

Salov North America Corp. (Filippo Berio Olive Oil) »

Defendant: Salov North America Corp.

Consumers who bought certain Filippo Berio Olive Oil products with the “Imported from Italy” label between May 23, 2010 and June 30, 2015 may be eligible for $2 total for 1 to 4 products purchased or $5 total for up to 10 products purchased. The company reached a settlement over allegations that the olives did not originate in Italy as implied by the label “Imported from Italy” on Filippo Berio olive oil products.

Read More »

×

Johnson & Johnson (Bedtime Bath Products) »

Defendant: Johnson & Johnson

Consumers who bought certain Johnson & Johnson Bedtime Bath Products between July 1, 2010 and August 31, 2016 may be eligible for $3 per product up to maximum of ten products.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of misleading the product as “clinically proven.”    Read More »

Johnson & Johnson (Bedtime Bath Products) »

Defendant: Johnson & Johnson

Consumers who bought certain Johnson & Johnson Bedtime Bath Products between July 1, 2010 and August 31, 2016 may be eligible for $3 per product up to maximum of ten products.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of misleading the product as “clinically proven.”

Read More »

×

Guthy-Renker (WEN) »

Defendant: Guthy-Renker

Consumers who bought certain WEN Hair Care products between November 1, 2007 and September 19, 2016 may be eligible for $25.  Consumers who bought WEN Hair Care products between November 1, 2007 and September 19, 2016 and suffered documented injuries from use of the product may be eligible for up… Read More »

Guthy-Renker (WEN) »

Defendant: Guthy-Renker

Consumers who bought certain WEN Hair Care products between November 1, 2007 and September 19, 2016 may be eligible for $25.  Consumers who bought WEN Hair Care products between November 1, 2007 and September 19, 2016 and suffered documented injuries from use of the product may be eligible for up to $20,000.  The company reached a settlement over allegations that the WEN Hair Care products cause severe hair loss, rash, burning eyes, and other bodily injuries.

Read More »

×

METHOD (or ECOVER Products) »

Defendant: People Against Dirty, PBC, & Method Products, PBC

Consumers who bought certain METHOD or ECOVER products from August 1, 2010 to April 27, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $2.8 million settlement.  The companies reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the METHOD and ECOVER products.    Read More »

METHOD (or ECOVER Products) »

Defendant: People Against Dirty, PBC, & Method Products, PBC

Consumers who bought certain METHOD or ECOVER products from August 1, 2010 to April 27, 2017 may be eligible for a share of the $2.8 million settlement.  The companies reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the METHOD and ECOVER products.

Read More »

×

Kelly Services Inc. (FCRA) »

Defendant: Kelly Services Inc.

The lawsuit alleges that Kelly Services Inc. failed to clearly disclose that the background checks would be obtained for employment purposes in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.  Individuals who applied for employment or were employed with an initial hire date between July 18, 2012 and January 23, 2014… Read More »

Kelly Services Inc. (FCRA) »

Defendant: Kelly Services Inc.

The lawsuit alleges that Kelly Services Inc. failed to clearly disclose that the background checks would be obtained for employment purposes in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.  Individuals who applied for employment or were employed with an initial hire date between July 18, 2012 and January 23, 2014 and had a background check with a liability release may be eligible for $90.  Individuals who applied for employment or were employed with an initial hire date between July 18, 2012 and January 23, 2014 and deemed “adjudicated ineligible” based on the background reports may be eligible for $272.

Read More »

×

Sprint (Early Termination Fee) »

Defendant: Sprint

The lawsuit alleges that Sprint violated California law by charging flat early termination fees that exceeded the actual harm suffered by Sprint.  California residents who had a wireless phone account with Sprint and paid a flat fee early termination fee between July 23, 1999 and March 18, 2007 may be… Read More »

Sprint (Early Termination Fee) »

Defendant: Sprint

The lawsuit alleges that Sprint violated California law by charging flat early termination fees that exceeded the actual harm suffered by Sprint.  California residents who had a wireless phone account with Sprint and paid a flat fee early termination fee between July 23, 1999 and March 18, 2007 may be eligible for $125 cash for each early termination fee paid.

Read More »

×

Caliber Home Loans (TCPA) »

Defendant: Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Consumers who received automated or prerecorded call on their cell phones from Caliber on or after July 9, 2011 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $2.8 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.      Read More »

Caliber Home Loans (TCPA) »

Defendant: Caliber Home Loans, Inc.

Consumers who received automated or prerecorded call on their cell phones from Caliber on or after July 9, 2011 may be eligible for a pro rata share of the $2.8 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.  

Read More »

×

Ford (Exhaust) »

Defendant: Ford

Alleges that 2011-2015 Ford Explorer vehicles are defectively designed, allowing exhaust odor to enter into the vehicle. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses (maximum of $500). The court approved the settlement on June 21, 2017 but the approval of the Settlement… Read More »

Ford (Exhaust) »

Defendant: Ford

Alleges that 2011-2015 Ford Explorer vehicles are defectively designed, allowing exhaust odor to enter into the vehicle. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses (maximum of $500).

The court approved the settlement on June 21, 2017 but the approval of the Settlement has been appealed.

Requests for reimbursement under the Customer Satisfaction Program must be submitted to your dealer before March 31, 2018.

Read More »

×

Guthy-Renker LLC (Proactiv) »

Defendant: Guthy-Renker LLC

California residents who purchased Proactiv products between January 22, 2009 and July 8, 2014 and were automatically enrolled in additional shipments and charged for products beyond their initial purchase may be eligible for cash payment or a Proactiv product worth a minimum of $75 with free shipping. The company reached… Read More »

Guthy-Renker LLC (Proactiv) »

Defendant: Guthy-Renker LLC

California residents who purchased Proactiv products between January 22, 2009 and July 8, 2014 and were automatically enrolled in additional shipments and charged for products beyond their initial purchase may be eligible for cash payment or a Proactiv product worth a minimum of $75 with free shipping. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violating California’s Automatic Renewal Law by failing to disclose that the shipments and billing is automatically renewed. 

Read More »

×

Endo Health Solutions (Fluoride Chewable Tablets) »

Defendant: Endo Health Solutions

Consumers who bought MultiVitamin with Fluoride Chewable Tablets between October 31, 2007 and December 31, 2015 may be eligible for a share of the $15.5 million settlement.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresenting the amount of fluoride in the MultiVitamin with Fluoride Chewable Tablets.    Read More »

Endo Health Solutions (Fluoride Chewable Tablets) »

Defendant: Endo Health Solutions

Consumers who bought MultiVitamin with Fluoride Chewable Tablets between October 31, 2007 and December 31, 2015 may be eligible for a share of the $15.5 million settlement.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresenting the amount of fluoride in the MultiVitamin with Fluoride Chewable Tablets.

Read More »

×

Sony (PlayStation 3) »

Defendant: Sony

The lawsuit alleges that Sony falsely advertised the Other OS functionality in Fat PS3s when a firmware update disabled the Other OS feature and functionality.  Consumers who purchased a Fat PS3 and used the Other OS after a Linux operating system installation between November 1, 2006 and April 1, 2010… Read More »

Sony (PlayStation 3) »

Defendant: Sony

The lawsuit alleges that Sony falsely advertised the Other OS functionality in Fat PS3s when a firmware update disabled the Other OS feature and functionality.  Consumers who purchased a Fat PS3 and used the Other OS after a Linux operating system installation between November 1, 2006 and April 1, 2010 may be eligible for $65 cash. If you have pregiously submitted the claim form, you do not have to submit another claim form.

Read More »

×

Central Payment Co., LLC (TCPA) »

Defendant: Central Payment Co., LLC

Consumers who received prerecorded call from Central Payment Co., LLC on or after August 18, 2011 may be eligible for an estimated $100-$150 cash.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.    Read More »

Central Payment Co., LLC (TCPA) »

Defendant: Central Payment Co., LLC

Consumers who received prerecorded call from Central Payment Co., LLC on or after August 18, 2011 may be eligible for an estimated $100-$150 cash.  The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Read More »

×