Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Sirius XM (Billing) »
Defendant: Sirius XM
Sirius XM agreed to a $3.8 million settlement regarding Sirius XM’s advertising and billing practices. According to the Ohio Attorney General and attorneys general of 44 states and DC, Sirius XM deceptively misrepresented the cancellation and renewal policy, automatically renewed contracts without notice or consent, and failed to provide timely… Read More »
Sirius XM (Billing) »
Defendant: Sirius XM
Source: http://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/Media/News-Releases/December-2014/Attorney-General-DeWine-Announces-$3-8-Million-Mul
Sirius XM agreed to a $3.8 million settlement regarding Sirius XM’s advertising and billing practices. According to the Ohio Attorney General and attorneys general of 44 states and DC, Sirius XM deceptively misrepresented the cancellation and renewal policy, automatically renewed contracts without notice or consent, and failed to provide timely refunds. Consumers who encountered such practices between July 28, 2008 and December 4, 2014 may be eligible for restitution and must file a complaint with their respective state attorney general.
×Airgas USA, LLC (FACTA) »
Defendant: Airgas USA, LLC
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions and received an electronically-printed receipt that contained the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card between April 4, 2011 and August 28, 2012 may be eligible for a $30 check. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of… Read More »
Airgas USA, LLC (FACTA) »
Defendant: Airgas USA, LLC
Consumers who conducted credit or debit card transactions and received an electronically-printed receipt that contained the expiration date of the consumer’s credit or debit card between April 4, 2011 and August 28, 2012 may be eligible for a $30 check. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act.
×AT&T Mobility (Cramming) »
Defendant: AT&T
AT&T agreed to $105 million settlement regarding AT&T’s unauthorized third-party charges for ringtones, wallpapers, and text message subscriptions. According to the Federal Trade Commission, AT&T deceptively hid the third-party charges under AT&T mobile phone services, making the unauthorized charges difficult to find. Current and former AT&T customers who paid for… Read More »
AT&T Mobility (Cramming) »
Defendant: AT&T
AT&T agreed to $105 million settlement regarding AT&T’s unauthorized third-party charges for ringtones, wallpapers, and text message subscriptions. According to the Federal Trade Commission, AT&T deceptively hid the third-party charges under AT&T mobile phone services, making the unauthorized charges difficult to find. Current and former AT&T customers who paid for unauthorized third-party charges
×Flax USA (Flax Milk) »
Defendant: Flax USA
Consumers who purchased certain flax milk between November 5, 2009 and September 22, 2014 may be eligible for up to $3.25 per carton, with maximum of 10 cartons. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “all natural” when some of the ingredients were artificial… Read More »
Flax USA (Flax Milk) »
Defendant: Flax USA
Consumers who purchased certain flax milk between November 5, 2009 and September 22, 2014 may be eligible for up to $3.25 per carton, with maximum of 10 cartons. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “all natural” when some of the ingredients were artificial or synthetic.
×Millward Brown (TCPA) »
Defendant: Millward Brown
Consumers who received automated or prerecorded survey call on their cell phones from Millward Brown between July 9, 2009 and February 10, 2015 may be eligible for up to $50. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Millward Brown (TCPA) »
Defendant: Millward Brown
Consumers who received automated or prerecorded survey call on their cell phones from Millward Brown between July 9, 2009 and February 10, 2015 may be eligible for up to $50. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Intel (Pentium 4) »
Defendant: Intel
Consumers who bought a new computer equipped with a Pentium 4 processor between November 20, 2000 and December 31, 2001 may be eligible may be eligible for $15 cash. Consumers who bought a new computer equipped with a Pentium 4 processor at speeds below 2.0 GHz between January 1, 2002… Read More »
Intel (Pentium 4) »
Defendant: Intel
Consumers who bought a new computer equipped with a Pentium 4 processor between November 20, 2000 and December 31, 2001 may be eligible may be eligible for $15 cash. Consumers who bought a new computer equipped with a Pentium 4 processor at speeds below 2.0 GHz between January 1, 2002 and June 30, 2002 may be eligible for $15 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of manipulation of the processor’s performance scores.
×Honda (Brake Pad) »
Defendant: Honda
The lawsuit alleges that the brake pads of certain 2006-2011 Honda vehicles wear out prematurely. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for cash reimbursement for repair expenses. Read More »
Honda (Brake Pad) »
Defendant: Honda
The lawsuit alleges that the brake pads of certain 2006-2011 Honda vehicles wear out prematurely. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for cash reimbursement for repair expenses.
×AmeriCredit Financial Services (TCPA) »
Defendant: AmeriCredit Financial Services
Consumers who received automatic, non-emergency telephone call on their cell phone or prerecorded call from AmeriCredit without consenting to receive such calls from December 30, 2007 and November 14, 2014 may be eligible for up to $150 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone… Read More »
AmeriCredit Financial Services (TCPA) »
Defendant: AmeriCredit Financial Services
Consumers who received automatic, non-emergency telephone call on their cell phone or prerecorded call from AmeriCredit without consenting to receive such calls from December 30, 2007 and November 14, 2014 may be eligible for up to $150 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Ghiradelli (White Chocolate Chips) »
Defendant: Ghiradelli
Consumers who purchased certain Ghirardelli products between August 17, 2008 and October 2, 2014 may be eligible for up to $24 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising “white chips” as white chocolate when the chips actually are not white chocolate because the chips do not… Read More »
Ghiradelli (White Chocolate Chips) »
Defendant: Ghiradelli
Consumers who purchased certain Ghirardelli products between August 17, 2008 and October 2, 2014 may be eligible for up to $24 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising “white chips” as white chocolate when the chips actually are not white chocolate because the chips do not contain cocoa butter. Final Fairness Hearing is on Feb. 19, 2015.
×Carter-Reed (Relacore) »
Defendant: Carter-Reed Co. LLC
Consumers who bought certain products from January 1, 2000 and November 10, 2014 may be eligible for up to $14 per bottle, with maximum of 2 bottles per household. The company reached a settlement over allegations of false and misleading labeling and advertising. Read More »
Carter-Reed (Relacore) »
Defendant: Carter-Reed Co. LLC
Consumers who bought certain products from January 1, 2000 and November 10, 2014 may be eligible for up to $14 per bottle, with maximum of 2 bottles per household. The company reached a settlement over allegations of false and misleading labeling and advertising.
×Babolat (Tennis Racquet) »
Defendant: Babolat
Consumers who bought certain Babolat tennis racquets between January 1, 2009 and November 11, 2014 may be eligible for up to $25 per junior racquet, with maximum of 10 racquets, or $50 per adult racquet, with maximum of 10 racquets. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising… Read More »
Babolat (Tennis Racquet) »
Defendant: Babolat
Consumers who bought certain Babolat tennis racquets between January 1, 2009 and November 11, 2014 may be eligible for up to $25 per junior racquet, with maximum of 10 racquets, or $50 per adult racquet, with maximum of 10 racquets. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the racquets sold to the public are the same as the racquets used by professional tennis players. The lawsuit also alleges that the company falsely advertised the racquets as containing tungsten when the racquets do not contain tungsten.
×Electrolux (Microwave Handle) »
Defendant: Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Alleges that Electrolux knowingly sold defective over-the-stove microwaves with stainless steel handles that overheat, resulting in burns. The case is Rice v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Case No. 4:15-cv-00371, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Read More »
Electrolux (Microwave Handle) »
Defendant: Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Source: http://www.law360.com/cases/54e79950b220e053b5000002
Alleges that Electrolux knowingly sold defective over-the-stove microwaves with stainless steel handles that overheat, resulting in burns. The case is Rice v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Case No. 4:15-cv-00371, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
×Red Bull »
Defendant: Red Bull
Consumers who bought Red Bull products between January 1, 2002 and October 3, 2014 may be eligible for $10 cash or certain Red Bull products. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresentation of the benefits and safety of Red Bull products. Read More »
Red Bull »
Defendant: Red Bull
Consumers who bought Red Bull products between January 1, 2002 and October 3, 2014 may be eligible for $10 cash or certain Red Bull products. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misrepresentation of the benefits and safety of Red Bull products.
×Verizon (Family Share Plan) »
Defendant: Verizon
Current and former Family Share Plan consumers who had different per-minute rates and charged higher after-allowance minute rates between May 11, 2002 and May 10, 2006 may be eligible for a pro rata share of $36.7 million settlement. Current and former Family Share Plan consumers who subscribed to “In-Network” calling… Read More »
Verizon (Family Share Plan) »
Defendant: Verizon
Current and former Family Share Plan consumers who had different per-minute rates and charged higher after-allowance minute rates between May 11, 2002 and May 10, 2006 may be eligible for a pro rata share of $36.7 million settlement. Current and former Family Share Plan consumers who subscribed to “In-Network” calling between May 11, 2002 and May 10, 2006 may be eligible for a pro rata share of $36.7 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations of improperly billing consumers when the calls should have been free under the Family Share Plan.Verizon (Family Share Plan)
×Bauer Publishing Co. (Magazine Subscription) »
Defendant: Bauer Publishing Co.
Michigan consumers who subscribed to certain magazines before September 26, 2014 may be eligible for up to $175 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of Michigan’s Video Rental Privacy Act, which prohibits discloses of consumers’ reading choices. The lawsuit alleges that the company disclosed without permission… Read More »
Bauer Publishing Co. (Magazine Subscription) »
Defendant: Bauer Publishing Co.
Michigan consumers who subscribed to certain magazines before September 26, 2014 may be eligible for up to $175 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of Michigan’s Video Rental Privacy Act, which prohibits discloses of consumers’ reading choices. The lawsuit alleges that the company disclosed without permission personal information of its subscribers to third parties for marketing purposes.
×