Class Action by Status
'closed' Listing
Sony (PlayStation Network) »
Defendant: Sony
The lawsuit alleges that Sony had inadequate security measures and was unable to protect accountholder information when unauthorized people attacked Sony networks in April 2011. PlayStation Network, Qriocity, or Sony Online Entertainment account holders before May 15, 2011 may be eligible for cash payments, game and online service benefits, or… Read More »
Sony (PlayStation Network) »
Defendant: Sony
The lawsuit alleges that Sony had inadequate security measures and was unable to protect accountholder information when unauthorized people attacked Sony networks in April 2011. PlayStation Network, Qriocity, or Sony Online Entertainment account holders before May 15, 2011 may be eligible for cash payments, game and online service benefits, or reimbursement for identity-theft-related charges.
×Arm & Hammer (Essential Deodorant) »
Defendant: Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
Consumers who bought Essential Deodorant with the “Natural Deodorant” and “Natural Protection” label may be eligible for up to $4 cash refund per unit. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “all natural” when not all of the ingredients were natural. Read More »
Arm & Hammer (Essential Deodorant) »
Defendant: Church & Dwight Co., Inc.
Consumers who bought Essential Deodorant with the “Natural Deodorant” and “Natural Protection” label may be eligible for up to $4 cash refund per unit. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “all natural” when not all of the ingredients were natural.
×Bank of America (Lien Release) »
Defendant: Bank of America
Consumers who own residential property in Georgia with a mortgage serviced by Bank of America or Countrywide between February 12, 2007 and April 1, 2015 and have paid the loan in full but did not receive lien satisfaction or lien cancellation documentation may be eligible for up to $500. The… Read More »
Bank of America (Lien Release) »
Defendant: Bank of America
Consumers who own residential property in Georgia with a mortgage serviced by Bank of America or Countrywide between February 12, 2007 and April 1, 2015 and have paid the loan in full but did not receive lien satisfaction or lien cancellation documentation may be eligible for up to $500. The company reached a settlement over allegations of failing to transmit a legally sufficient satisfaction or cancellation of lien within the time required by Georgia law.
×Diamond Foods, Inc. (Kettle) »
Defendant: Diamond Foods, Inc.
Consumers who bought certain Kettle products between January 3, 2010 and February 24, 2015 may be eligible for up to $20 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “all natural” when not all of the ingredients were natural. Read More »
Diamond Foods, Inc. (Kettle) »
Defendant: Diamond Foods, Inc.
Consumers who bought certain Kettle products between January 3, 2010 and February 24, 2015 may be eligible for up to $20 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising the products as “all natural” when not all of the ingredients were natural.
×Target (Data Breach) »
Defendant: Target
Consumers who shopped at Target between November 27, 2013 and December 18, 2013 and received notice that their personal information was compromised may be eligible for a share of the $10 million settlement. The case is In re: Target Corporation Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, U.S. District Court, District of… Read More »
Target (Data Breach) »
Defendant: Target
Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/target-reaches-proposed-settlement-with-data-breach-victims/
Consumers who shopped at Target between November 27, 2013 and December 18, 2013 and received notice that their personal information was compromised may be eligible for a share of the $10 million settlement. The case is In re: Target Corporation Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota, No. 14-md-02522.
×BevMo (5 Cent Sale) »
Defendant: BevMo
Consumers may be eligible for $1 coupon for each two-bottle set of wine purchased during BevMo’s 5 Cent Sale between October 21, 2005 and February 9, 2010. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misleading statements of the amount of the discounts from the 5 Cent Sale. Read More »
BevMo (5 Cent Sale) »
Defendant: BevMo
Consumers may be eligible for $1 coupon for each two-bottle set of wine purchased during BevMo’s 5 Cent Sale between October 21, 2005 and February 9, 2010. The company reached a settlement over allegations of misleading statements of the amount of the discounts from the 5 Cent Sale.
×Vendini (Data Breach) »
Defendant: Vendini
Vendini is an online ticketing system used by sports groups, art shows, concerts, and festivals. Consumers whose personal identification information were within Vendini’s computer network servers on or before April 25, 2013 may be eligible for a share of the $3 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations… Read More »
Vendini (Data Breach) »
Defendant: Vendini
Vendini is an online ticketing system used by sports groups, art shows, concerts, and festivals. Consumers whose personal identification information were within Vendini’s computer network servers on or before April 25, 2013 may be eligible for a share of the $3 million settlement. The company reached a settlement over allegations that it allowed unauthorized third-parties access its databases and customers’ personal identification information.
×Walgreens (TCPA) »
Defendant: Walgreens
Consumers who received prerecorded prescription refill reminder calls on their cell phones from Walgreens on or before April 3, 2015 may be eligible for up to $15. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Read More »
Walgreens (TCPA) »
Defendant: Walgreens
Consumers who received prerecorded prescription refill reminder calls on their cell phones from Walgreens on or before April 3, 2015 may be eligible for up to $15. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Michaels (Custom Framing) »
Defendant: Michaels
Consumers who purchased custom framing products or services at Michaels stores in Ohio from January 1, 2009 and October 7, 2011 may be eligible for a $32.50 Michaels certificate. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising its custom framing products and services as being on sale when… Read More »
Michaels (Custom Framing) »
Defendant: Michaels
Consumers who purchased custom framing products or services at Michaels stores in Ohio from January 1, 2009 and October 7, 2011 may be eligible for a $32.50 Michaels certificate. The company reached a settlement over allegations of falsely advertising its custom framing products and services as being on sale when not.
×Comcast (Monopoly) »
Defendant: Comcast
Current and former Comcast subscribers between 2003 and 2008 in certain counties in Pennsylvania may be eligible for up to $15 cash or credit. The company agreed to a settlement over allegations of violations of antitrust conduct, which resulted in higher prices for subscribers. Read More »
Comcast (Monopoly) »
Defendant: Comcast
Current and former Comcast subscribers between 2003 and 2008 in certain counties in Pennsylvania may be eligible for up to $15 cash or credit. The company agreed to a settlement over allegations of violations of antitrust conduct, which resulted in higher prices for subscribers.
×Hyundai (Fuel Economy) »
Defendant: Hyundai
The lawsuit alleges Hyundai misrepresented the fuel economy ratings for certain 2011-2013 models. Consumers who purchased or leased those models on or before November 2, 2012 may be eligible for either lump sum reimbursement or the lifetime reimbursement program. Read More »
Hyundai (Fuel Economy) »
Defendant: Hyundai
The lawsuit alleges Hyundai misrepresented the fuel economy ratings for certain 2011-2013 models. Consumers who purchased or leased those models on or before November 2, 2012 may be eligible for either lump sum reimbursement or the lifetime reimbursement program.
×Honda (CR-V Door Lock) »
Defendant: Honda
The lawsuit alleges that the power door lock actuators of certain 2007-2009 Honda CR-Vs vehicles were defectively designed and did not work properly. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for a new door lock actuator, warranty extension, or cash reimbursement for repair expenses. Read More »
Honda (CR-V Door Lock) »
Defendant: Honda
The lawsuit alleges that the power door lock actuators of certain 2007-2009 Honda CR-Vs vehicles were defectively designed and did not work properly. Consumers who purchased or leased those models may be eligible for a new door lock actuator, warranty extension, or cash reimbursement for repair expenses.
×Life Time Fitness (TCPA) »
Defendant: Life Time Fitness
Consumers who received automated text messages on their cell phone from Life Time Fitness between January 2014 and April 2014 may be eligible for $100 cash, or a free 3-month single membership, or $250 credit toward any membership. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone… Read More »
Life Time Fitness (TCPA) »
Defendant: Life Time Fitness
Source: http://www.meyerwilson.com/Blog/2015/March/Life-Time-Fitness-Agrees-to-10-15-Million-Class-.aspx
Consumers who received automated text messages on their cell phone from Life Time Fitness between January 2014 and April 2014 may be eligible for $100 cash, or a free 3-month single membership, or $250 credit toward any membership. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
×Capital One (Zero Percent) »
Defendant: Capital One
Consumers who use a 0% Access Check or No Hassle Check on their Capital One credit card between August 1, 2008 and January 2, 2015 may be eligible for up to $5.50 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Truth in Lending Act and the… Read More »
Capital One (Zero Percent) »
Defendant: Capital One
Consumers who use a 0% Access Check or No Hassle Check on their Capital One credit card between August 1, 2008 and January 2, 2015 may be eligible for up to $5.50 cash. The company reached a settlement over allegations of violations of the Truth in Lending Act and the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009.Capital One (Zero Percent)
×T-Mobile (Premium SMS) »
Defendant: T-Mobile
T-Mobile agreed to $90 million settlement regarding T-Mobile’s unauthorized third-party charges for text message subscriptions of sports scores, weather, jokes or horoscopes. Current and former T-Mobile customers who were charged for unauthorized Premium Text Messages may be eligible for refund of unauthorized Premium Text Messages that were not reimbursed. Deadline… Read More »
T-Mobile (Premium SMS) »
Defendant: T-Mobile
Source: http://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2014/12/t-mobile-pay-least-90-million-including-full-consumer-refunds
T-Mobile agreed to $90 million settlement regarding T-Mobile’s unauthorized third-party charges for text message subscriptions of sports scores, weather, jokes or horoscopes. Current and former T-Mobile customers who were charged for unauthorized Premium Text Messages may be eligible for refund of unauthorized Premium Text Messages that were not reimbursed. Deadline for Account Summary Request Form is April 30, 2015.
×